Exploration of Cybercivility in Nursing Education Using Cross-Country Comparisons

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Sang Suk [1 ]
Lee, Jung Jae [2 ]
De Gagne, Jennie C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Red Cross Coll Nursing, Seoul 06974, South Korea
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
cyberbullying; cyberincivility; experience; knowledge; nursing student; perception; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; SOCIAL MEDIA; NEEDS-ASSESSMENT; ONLINE; MANAGEMENT; INCIVILITY; STUDENTS; CIVILITY; NURSES;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17197209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many nursing students have experienced negative social behaviors and incivility in cyberspace. We aimed to explore knowledge, experience, and acceptability of cyberincivility, as well as the perceived benefits of cybercivility education among nursing students in the United States of America (USA), Hong Kong (HK), and South Korea (K). We used a cross-sectional study design. The Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire was administered to participants, and data were collected from 336 nursing students from a university in each country (USA (n = 90), HK (n = 115), and K (n = 131)). Cyberincivility was perceived as a problem by 76.8% of respondents. More than 50% of respondents had experienced cyberincivility, were knowledgeable about it, and found it unacceptable. Longer hours spent on social networking services and perception of cyberincivility were positively associated with the variables, but negatively associated with perceived benefits of learning. Cross-country differences in items and level of variables were identified (p < 0.01). The HK respondents demonstrated lower knowledge, compared to USA and K respondents. Frequency of cyberincivility experience and perceived learning benefit were lower for students in the USA than in HK and K. Acceptability of cyberincivility was significantly lower in respondents from K. Developing educational programs on general and sociocultural patterns of online communication could be useful in promoting cybercivility globally.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Institutional Foundations of Entrepreneurship: An Introduction and Cross-country Comparisons
    Lee, Soo Hee
    Williams, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY ECONOMICS, 2007, 18 (2-3) : 113 - 119
  • [22] Cross-country productivity comparisons: The "revealed superiority" approach
    Bar-Shira, Z
    Finkelshtain, I
    Simhon, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2003, 8 (03) : 301 - 323
  • [23] Financial Education in Secondary Education: A Cross-Country Analysis
    Lopez-Agudo, Luis Alejandro
    Marcenaro-Gutierrez, Oscar David
    [J]. CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2023, 69 (01) : 21 - 60
  • [24] Perceptions of perioperative nursing competence: a cross-country comparison
    Brigid M. Gillespie
    Emma B. Harbeck
    Karin Falk-Brynhildsen
    Ulrica Nilsson
    Maria Jaensson
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 17
  • [25] Perceptions of perioperative nursing competence: a cross-country comparison
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Harbeck, Emma B.
    Falk-Brynhildsen, Karin
    Nilsson, Ulrica
    Jaensson, Maria
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2018, 17
  • [26] The transition of education a cross-country macro analysis
    Paldam, Martin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2024, 84
  • [27] Labor market flexibility: An index approach to cross-country comparisons
    Lawson, RA
    Bierhanzl, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH, 2004, 25 (01) : 117 - 126
  • [28] Nonlinearities in intergenerational earnings mobility:: Consequences for cross-country comparisons
    Bratsberg, Bernt
    Roed, Knut
    Raaum, Oddbjorn
    Naylor, Robin
    Jantti, Markus
    Eriksson, Tor
    Osterbacka, Eva
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 117 (519): : C72 - C92
  • [29] Cross-Country Comparisons of Cultural Statistics: Issues and Good Practice
    Madden, Christopher
    [J]. CULTURAL TRENDS, 2005, 14 (04) : 299 - 316
  • [30] Labor market flexibility: An index approach to cross-country comparisons
    Robert A. Lawson
    Edward Bierhanzl
    [J]. Journal of Labor Research, 2004, 25 : 117 - 126