Exploration of Cybercivility in Nursing Education Using Cross-Country Comparisons

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Sang Suk [1 ]
Lee, Jung Jae [2 ]
De Gagne, Jennie C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Red Cross Coll Nursing, Seoul 06974, South Korea
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
cyberbullying; cyberincivility; experience; knowledge; nursing student; perception; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; SOCIAL MEDIA; NEEDS-ASSESSMENT; ONLINE; MANAGEMENT; INCIVILITY; STUDENTS; CIVILITY; NURSES;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17197209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many nursing students have experienced negative social behaviors and incivility in cyberspace. We aimed to explore knowledge, experience, and acceptability of cyberincivility, as well as the perceived benefits of cybercivility education among nursing students in the United States of America (USA), Hong Kong (HK), and South Korea (K). We used a cross-sectional study design. The Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire was administered to participants, and data were collected from 336 nursing students from a university in each country (USA (n = 90), HK (n = 115), and K (n = 131)). Cyberincivility was perceived as a problem by 76.8% of respondents. More than 50% of respondents had experienced cyberincivility, were knowledgeable about it, and found it unacceptable. Longer hours spent on social networking services and perception of cyberincivility were positively associated with the variables, but negatively associated with perceived benefits of learning. Cross-country differences in items and level of variables were identified (p < 0.01). The HK respondents demonstrated lower knowledge, compared to USA and K respondents. Frequency of cyberincivility experience and perceived learning benefit were lower for students in the USA than in HK and K. Acceptability of cyberincivility was significantly lower in respondents from K. Developing educational programs on general and sociocultural patterns of online communication could be useful in promoting cybercivility globally.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-country comparisons
    Turkson, JK
    Redlinger, RY
    [J]. POWER SECTOR REFORM IN SUBSAHARAN AFRICAN, 1999, : 186 - 203
  • [2] Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons
    Archambault, T
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 2 - ISSI-2001, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 41 - 52
  • [3] Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons
    Archambault, É
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 54 (01) : 15 - 30
  • [4] Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons
    Éric Archambault
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54 : 15 - 30
  • [5] Misbehaving Lawyers: Cross-Country Comparisons
    Levin, Leslie C.
    [J]. LEGAL ETHICS, 2012, 15 (02) : 357 - 377
  • [6] Cross-Country Comparisons of Environmental Concern
    Nowak, Krzysztof
    Markiewicz, Dorota
    Gawraczynski, Jakub
    Mazurkiewicz, Pawel
    [J]. PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2016, 14 (02): : 83 - 101
  • [7] A Cross-Country Exploration of Environmental Attitudes
    Sarigoellue, Emine
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2009, 41 (03) : 365 - 386
  • [8] PHYSIOLOGICAL COMPARISONS OF CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING TECHNIQUES
    HOFFMAN, MD
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1992, 24 (09): : 1023 - 1032
  • [9] Interpersonal trust: measuring, and cross-country comparisons
    Rukavishnikov, V. O.
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2008, (02): : 17 - 25
  • [10] The Composition of Capital and Cross-country Productivity Comparisons
    Inklaar, Robert
    Woltjer, Pieter
    Albarran, Daniel Gallardo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY MONITOR, 2019, 36 : 34 - 52