Comparison of fluidized bed flow regimes for steam methane reforming in membrane reactors: A simulation study

被引:31
|
作者
Mahecha-Botero, Andres [1 ]
Chen, Zhongxiang [1 ]
Grace, John R. [1 ]
Elnashaie, S. S. E. H.
Lim, C. Jim [1 ]
Rakib, Mohammad [1 ]
Yasuda, Isamu [2 ]
Shirasaki, Yoshinori [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Dept Biol & Chem Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Tokyo Gas Co Ltd, Hydrogen Syst Team, Technol Res Inst, Tsurumi Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2300045, Japan
关键词
Fluidized bed; Hydrogen production; Fluidization regimes; Mathematical modelling; Membranes; Multiphase reactors; Reaction engineering; Simulation; PARTIAL OXIDATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; GAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2009.04.044
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An important decision in the design of fluidized bed reactors is which of several flow regimes to choose. Almost all fluidized bed reactor models are restricted to a single flow regime, making comparison difficult, especially near the regime boundaries. This paper examines the performance of fluidized bed methane reformers with three models-a simple equilibrium model and two kinetic distributed models, based on different assumptions of varying sophistication. Membranes are incorporated to improve reactor performance. Eighteen cases are simulated for different flow regimes and membrane configurations. Predictions for the fast fluidization and turbulent flow regimes show that the rate-controlling step is permeation through the membranes. Bubbling regime simulations predict somewhat less hydrogen production than for turbulent and fast fluidization, due to the effects of interphase crossflow and mass transfer. Overall reactor performance is predicted to be best under turbulent fluidization operation. Practical considerations also affect the advantages, shortcomings and ultimate choice of flow regime. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3598 / 3613
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stagewise fluidized bed membrane reactors for methane-steam reforming
    Abashar, MEE
    [J]. AFINIDAD, 2003, 60 (504) : 184 - 191
  • [2] Investigation of methane-steam reforming in fluidized bed membrane reactors
    Abashar, MEE
    Alhumaizi, KI
    Adris, AM
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2003, 81 (A2): : 251 - 258
  • [4] Optimal Operation and Control of Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactors for Steam Methane Reforming
    Marquez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Wu, Jiaen
    Ozkan, Leyla
    Gallucci, Fausto
    Annaland, Martin Van Sint
    [J]. 29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2019, 46 : 1231 - 1236
  • [5] Theoretical comparison of packed bed and fluidized bed membrane reactors for methane reforming
    Gallucci, Fausto
    Van Sintannaland, Martin
    Kuipers, J. A. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (13) : 7142 - 7150
  • [6] Reaction/separation coupled equilibrium modeling of steam methane reforming in fluidized bed membrane reactors
    Xie, Donglai
    Qiao, Weiyan
    Wang, Ziliang
    Wang, Weixing
    Yu, Hao
    Peng, Feng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (21) : 11798 - 11809
  • [7] A FLUIDIZED-BED MEMBRANE REACTOR FOR THE STEAM REFORMING OF METHANE
    ADRIS, AM
    ELNASHAIE, SSEH
    HUGHES, R
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 69 (05): : 1061 - 1070
  • [8] STUDY ON METHANE STEAM REFORMING IN MEMBRANE REACTORS
    CUN Cheng-Yan CHEN Yi-Jun QU Mei-Zheng AN Wei-ZhuChengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry
    [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 1994, (04) : 442 - 452
  • [9] Steam reforming of methane in a tapered membrane - Assisted fluidized - Bed reactor: Modeling and simulation
    Dehkordi, Asghar Molaei
    Savari, Chiya
    Ghasemi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) : 490 - 504
  • [10] Modeling of fluidized bed membrane reactors for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming with Aspen Plus
    Ye, Genyin
    Xie, Donglai
    Qiao, Weiyan
    Grace, John R.
    Lim, C. Jim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (11) : 4755 - 4762