Measuring Complexity in Financial Data

被引:3
|
作者
Yadav, Gaurang Singh [1 ]
Guha, Apratim [2 ,3 ]
Chakrabarti, Anindya S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[2] Xavier Sch Management, XLRI, Prod Operat & Decis Sci Area, Jamshedpur, Bihar, India
[3] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Prod & Quantitat Methods Area, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[4] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Econ Area, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
complex systems; networks; spectral analysis; mutual information; interaction; Granger causality; algorithmic complexity; SYSTEMIC RISK; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2020.00339
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The stock market is a canonical example of a complex system, in which a large number of interacting agents lead to joint evolution of stock returns and the collective market behavior exhibits emergent properties. However, quantifying complexity in stock market data is a challenging task. In this report, we explore four different measures for characterizing the intrinsic complexity by evaluating the structural relationships between stock returns. The first two measures are based on linear and non-linear co-movement structures (accounting for contemporaneous and Granger causal relationships), the third is based on algorithmic complexity, and the fourth is based on spectral analysis of interacting dynamical systems. Our analysis of a dataset comprising daily prices of a large number of stocks in the complete historical data of NASDAQ (1972-2018) shows that the third and fourth measures are able to identify the greatest global economic downturn in 2007-09 and associated spillovers substantially more accurately than the first two measures. We conclude this report with a discussion of the implications of such quantification methods for risk management in complex systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The importance of the comparative benchmark for measuring composite financial literacy with survey data
    Liu, Fang
    Lei, Hanyun
    Lu, Wenyi
    Yin, Qiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] Change analysis of a dynamic copula for measuring dependence in multivariate financial data
    Guegan, D.
    Zhang, J.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2010, 10 (04) : 421 - 430
  • [33] Measuring complexity with zippers
    Baronchelli, A
    Caglioti, E
    Loreto, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2005, 26 (05) : S69 - S77
  • [34] Measuring the 'complexity' of sound
    Singh, Nandini Chatterjee
    [J]. PRAMANA-JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2011, 77 (05): : 811 - 816
  • [35] Measuring map complexity
    Fairbairn, David
    [J]. CARTOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (03): : 224 - 238
  • [36] The Implications of Measuring Complexity
    Green, Lee A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 8 (04) : 291 - 292
  • [37] Measuring Project Complexity
    Tie, Brett Nan
    Bolluijt, Jeroen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE 2014), 2014, : 248 - 253
  • [38] Measuring and managing complexity
    Samuel, Sophia
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 46 (06) : 357 - 357
  • [39] MEASURING PROGRAM COMPLEXITY
    MCAULIFFE, D
    [J]. COMPUTER, 1988, 21 (06) : 97 - 98
  • [40] Measuring the ‘complexity’ of sound
    NANDINI CHATTERJEE SINGH
    [J]. Pramana, 2011, 77 : 811 - 816