Beyond Ecosystem Services: Valuing the Invaluable

被引：36

作者：

Gunton, Richard M. ^{[1
,2
]}

van Asperen, Eline N. ^{[3
]}

Basden, Andrew ^{[4
]}

Bookless, David ^{[5
,6
]}

Araya, Yoseph ^{[7
]}

Hanson, David R. ^{[2
]}

Goddard, Mark A. ^{[8
]}

Otieno, George ^{[9
]}

Jones, Gareth O. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England

[2] West Yorkshire Sch Christian Studies, Outwood House, Leeds LS18 4JN, W Yorkshire, England

[3] Univ Durham, Dept Anthropol, Durham DH1 3LA, England

[4] Univ Salford, Salford Business Sch, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England

[5] Rocha Int, 89 Worship St, London EC2A 2BF, England

[6] Univ Cambridge, Fac Divin, Cambridge CB3 9BS, England

[7] Open Univ, Sch Environm Earth & Ecosyst, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England

[8] Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England

[9] Leeds Trinity Univ, Sch Arts & Commun, Leeds LS18 5HD, W Yorkshire, England

来源：

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION | 2017年 / 32卷 / 04期

关键词：

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; VALUES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tree.2017.01.002

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

The ecosystem services framework (ESF) is advantageous and widely used for itemising and quantifying ways in which humans benefit from natural places. However, it suffers from two important problems: (i) incoherence of definitions and (ii) a narrow approach to valuation, inadequate to represent the full range of human motives for conservation and the diverse interests of different stakeholders. These shortcomings can lead to a range of problems including doublecounting, blind spots and unintended consequences. In this opinion article, we propose an ecosystem valuing framework as a broader and more rigorous way to deliver the benefits currently sought from the ESF, without the conceptual problems.

引用

页码：249 / 257

页数：9

共 50 条

[41] Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment
De Valck, Jeremy
Beames, Alistair
Liekens, Inge
Bettens, Maarten
Seuntjens, Piet
Broekx, Steven
[J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 : 139 - 149
[42] Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests
Hayha, Tiina
Franzese, Pier Paolo
Paletto, Alessandro
Fath, Brian D.
[J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 14 : 12 - 23
[43] Where is the value in valuing pollination ecosystem services to agriculture?
Melathopoulos, Andony P.
Cutler, G. Christopher
Tyedmers, Peter
[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 109 : 59 - 70
[44] Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds
Kaiser, B
Roumasset, J
[J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2002, 7 : 701 - 714
[45] Valuing the invaluable: how much is the planet worth?
Mayer, Colin
[J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 35 (01) : 109 - 119
[46] Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands
Cannon, Lauryn
[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 72 : 189 - 190
[47] Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production
Richmond, Amy
Kaufmann, Robert K.
Myneni, Ranga B.
[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) : 454 - 462
[48] Valuing ecosystem services for sustainable landscape planning in Alpine regions
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
Walz, Ariane
Bebi, Peter
[J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (02) : 156 - 165
[49] Valuing ecosystem services to explore scenarios for adaptive spatial planning
Lerouge, Frederik
Gulinck, Hubert
Vranken, Liesbet
[J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 81 : 30 - 40
[50] Valuing preservation and restoration alternatives for ecosystem services in the southwestern USA
Broadbent, Craig D.
Brookshire, David S.
Goodrich, David
Dixon, Mark D.
Brand, L. Arriana
Thacher, Jennifer
Stewart, Steve
[J]. ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (05) : 851 - 862

← 1 2 3 4 5 →