Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia

被引:10
|
作者
Zullo, Andrew R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lou, Uvette [5 ]
Cabral, Sarah E. [1 ]
Huynh, Justin [1 ]
Berard-Collins, Christine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Pharm, Providence, RI USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Hlth Serv Policy & Practice, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Ctr Innovat Long Term Serv & Supports, Providence Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Providence, RI USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pharm, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; practice patterns; physicians'; pharmacy; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; adverse effects; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS; CHEMOTHERAPY DOSE-INTENSITY; NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA; GROWTH-FACTORS; BREAST-CANCER; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RECEIVING CHOP; RISK; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/1078155218792698
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Guidelines recommend pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia after highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy. While deviations from guidelines could result in overuse and increased costs, underuse is also a concern and could compromise quality of care. Our objectives were to evaluate guideline adherence and quantify the extent to which physician heterogeneity may influence pegfilgrastim use. Methods We randomly sampled 550 patients from a retrospective cohort of those who received infusions at an academic cancer center between 1 September 2013 and 1 September 2014. Electronic medical and drug dispensing records provided information on patient characteristics, chemotherapy characteristics, prescribing physician, and pegfilgrastim administration. Results We included 154 patients treated by 25 physicians. About half of patients were male and mean age was 61.3 years. Forty (26.1%) patients had no febrile neutropenia risk factors, 62 (40.5%) had one, and 51 (33.3%) had two or more. Thirty patients (19.5%) received pegfilgrastim, of which 12 (40%) received palliative chemotherapy. Nine (60%) of 15 patients on a regimen with a febrile neutropenia risk >= 20% received pegfilgrastim. Pegfilgrastim use significantly varied by cancer type (p < 0.01), chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.001), and regimen febrile neutropenia risk (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis reaffirmed the association between chemotherapy regimen febrile neutropenia risk >= 20% and pegfilgrastim use (odds ratio (OR) = 10.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-62.7) and suggested that 31% (95% CI: 8%-71%) of the variation in use was attributable to physician characteristics. Conclusion Pegfilgrastim was potentially overused for palliative chemotherapy and underused for chemotherapy regimens with febrile neutropenia risk >= 20%. Successful interventions to modify prescribing practices likely require an understanding of the relationship between specific physician characteristics and pegfilgrastim use.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1365
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim in docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy for esophageal cancer
    Ichimura, T.
    Nomura, H.
    Shimizu, H.
    Machida, Y.
    Suzuki, K.
    [J]. PHARMAZIE, 2021, 76 (09): : 450 - 454
  • [22] Underuse and overuse of colonoscopy in primary care
    Pache, I
    Froehlich, F
    Schneider, C
    Bumand, B
    Vader, JP
    DuBois, RW
    Brook, RH
    Gonvers, JJ
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : A34 - A34
  • [23] Primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim is cost-effective compared with secondary prophylaxis for women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy
    Ramsey, S. D.
    Liu, Z.
    Boer, R.
    Malin, J. L.
    Sullivan, S. D.
    Doan, Q., V
    Dubois, R. W.
    Lyman, G. H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (03) : A125 - A126
  • [24] Overuse and Underuse of Aspirin for Primary Prevention
    Sperl-Hillen, Joann M.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Margolis, Karen L.
    Crain, A. L.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2016, 65 : A321 - A321
  • [25] Febrile neutropenia: antifungal prophylaxis
    Donnelly, JP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2000, 16 (02) : 127 - 130
  • [26] Antimicrobial prophylaxis in febrile neutropenia
    Yoshida, M
    Ohno, R
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 : S65 - S67
  • [27] Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia (NF)
    Jovenin, Nicolas
    [J]. ONCOLOGIE, 2015, 17 (10) : 445 - 454
  • [28] Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany
    Sehouli, J.
    Goertz, A.
    Steinle, T.
    Dubois, R.
    Plesnila-Frank, C.
    Lalla, A.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (09) : 385 - 389
  • [29] Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia With Pegfilgrastim in Small-cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Amrubicin as Second-line Therapy
    Sato, Yukina
    Iihara, Hirotoshi
    Kinomura, Motohiko
    Hirose, Chiemi
    Fujii, Hironori
    Endo, Junki
    Yanase, Komei
    Kaito, Daizo
    Sasaki, Yuka
    Gomyo, Takenobu
    Sakai, Chizuru
    Iwai, Masamichi
    Tsuboi, Yoshiki
    Ishihara, Takuma
    Kobayashi, Ryo
    Ohno, Yasushi
    Suzuki, Akio
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (03) : 1615 - 1620
  • [30] Filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim as primary prevention for reduction of chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia in Nepal
    Sharma, R.
    Dangol, R. Shilpakar
    Thapa, S.
    Paudel, B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : 1541 - 1541