Limited incision carpal tunnel release

被引:14
|
作者
Gaba, Sunil [1 ]
Bhogesha, Sandeep [1 ]
Singh, Onkar [2 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Plast Surg, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Command Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Carpal tunnel syndrome; carpal tunnel release; limited incision; nasal speculum; nerve conduction study; ENDOSCOPIC RELEASE; PALMAR INCISION; MEDIAN NERVE; DECOMPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; TESTS;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5413.201700
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. Limited incision techniques for carpal tunnel release are gaining popularity. The main advantages of these techniques are less scar load, less pillar pain, shorter recovery, and return-to-work time. However, the completeness of release, and risk of neurovascular injury are always a concern. We devised a method of limited incision release with two mini-incisions and use of nasal speculum and a probe. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and neurological outcome of this technique. Materials and Methods: Twenty seven cases (9 male and 18 female, age 28-56 years) of isolated CTS cases were enrolled in the study. A total of 33 hands (six bilateral) underwent limited incision carpal tunnel release. In this study, two mini-incisions were used and release was done with the help of nasal speculum. Evaluation preoperatively and in 6 months and at 1-year postoperatively was done, namely, (a) clinical status examination, (b) motor testing using grip and pinch dynamometer, and (c) neurological outcome measure using nerve conduction study. Results: All the patients had good clinical and neurological outcome with no recurrence during followup. The first symptom to get relieved was night pains, with a mean of 4.5 days (range 2-14 days). Compared to pain, improvement of sensory symptoms was delayed; the mean duration was 42.8 days (range 30-90 days). Scar tenderness was present only for a mean duration of 9 days (range 7-21 days). The mean duration for patients to resume their daily activities was 12 days (range 7-28 days) and to work was 32 days (range 21-90 days). The hand grip showed mean values of 45.12 +/- 16.16 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 62.45 +/- 18.86 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 74.87 +/- 20.35 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The key pinch showed mean values of 11.27 +/- 3.51 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 20.181 +/- 3.94 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 27.96 +/- 94.42 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The tip pinch showed mean values of 8.88 +/- 2.39 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 15.393 +/- 3.25 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 19.27 +/- 4.81 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The palmar pinch showed mean values of 14.42 +/- 2.92 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 19.303 +/- 3.62 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 22.97 +/- 4.08 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. Conclusion: Limited incision carpal tunnel release can be considered a feasible alternative to traditional open release and endoscopic release.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CARPAL-TUNNEL RELEASE USING LIMITED DIRECT VISION
    ABOUZAHR, MK
    PATSIS, MC
    CHIU, DTW
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 95 (03) : 534 - 538
  • [32] Experience of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome that Operated Using a Limited Uni Skin Incision
    Isik, Hasan Serdar
    Bostanci, Ugur
    [J]. TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 21 (02) : 177 - 180
  • [33] CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH A LIMITED PALMAR INCISION: CLINICAL RESULTS AND PILLAR PAIN AT 18 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP
    Yung, Patrick Shu-Hang
    Hung, Leung-Kim
    Tong, Christopher Wai-Chung
    Ho, Pak-Cheung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2005, 10 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [34] A comparison of two limited open techniques for carpal tunnel release
    Zyluk, A.
    Strychar, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2006, 31B (05): : 466 - 472
  • [35] Carpal tunnel release: transverse or longitudinal limited-incisions?
    Prejbeanu, R.
    Vermesan, D.
    Crainiceanu, Z.
    Nitescu, S.
    Lazureanu, V.
    Florescu, S.
    Balanescu, A.
    Inchingolo, F.
    Ballini, A.
    Cagiano, R.
    Caprio, M.
    Potenza, M. A.
    Abbinante, A.
    Dipalma, G.
    Haragus, H.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2015, 166 (03): : E158 - E164
  • [36] Limited portal carpal tunnel release. An alternative to classic open release?
    Jaminet, P.
    Werdin, F.
    Jabsen, J. S.
    Kraus, A.
    Sinis, N.
    Schaller, H. E.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2010, 39 (11): : 1029 - +
  • [37] Mini-open transverse flexor crease incision versus limited longitudinal palmar incision carpal tunnel release: A short term outcome study
    Fazil, V. V. Muhammed
    Surendran, Sibin
    Karuppal, Raju
    Gopinathan, Patinharayil
    Marthya, Anwar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 29 : 15 - 21
  • [38] ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL-TUNNEL RELEASE USING THE SINGLE PROXIMAL INCISION TECHNIQUE
    AGEE, JM
    MCCARROLL, HR
    NORTH, ER
    [J]. HAND CLINICS, 1994, 10 (04) : 647 - 659
  • [39] Comparison between two mini incision techniques utilized in carpal tunnel release
    Bal, Emin
    Piskin, Ahmet
    Ada, Sait
    Ademoglu, Yalcin
    Toros, Tulgar
    Kayalar, Murat
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2008, 42 (04) : 234 - 237
  • [40] Two incision mini open carpal tunnel release - a minimally invasive alternative to endoscopic release
    Hashmi, Pervaiz Mehmood
    Rashid, Rizwan Haroon
    Ali, Moiz
    Mohib, Yasir
    Baloch, Naveed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (10) : S93 - S95