Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities

被引:47
|
作者
Ke, Haiqian [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wenyi [3 ]
Liu, Xiaoyang [4 ]
Fan, Fei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Inst Cent China Dev, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Nanyang Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanyang 473000, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Inst Reg & Urban Rural Dev, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
innovation efficiency; ecological footprint; threshold regression; mediating effect; KUZNETS CURVE HYPOTHESIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; POPULATION; CONSTRUCTION; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17186826
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovation is an important motivating force for regional sustainable development. This study measures the innovation efficiency of 280 cities in China from 2014-2018 using the super-efficiency slack-based measure and it also analyzes its impact on the ecological footprint using the generalized spatial two-stage least squares (GS2SLS) method and uses the threshold regression model to explore the threshold effect of innovation efficiency on the ecological footprint at different economic development levels. We find the corresponding transmission mechanism by using a mediating effect model. The major findings are as follows. First, we find an inverse U-shaped relationship between innovation efficiency and the ecological footprint for cities across China as well as in the eastern and central regions. That is, innovation efficiency promotes then suppresses the ecological footprint. Conversely, in western and northeastern China, improvements in innovation efficiency still raise the ecological footprint. Second, for the entire country, as economic development increases from below one threshold value (4.4928) to above another (4.8245), the elasticity coefficient of innovation efficiency to the ecological footprint changes from -0.0067 to -0.0313. This indicates that the ability of innovation efficiency improvements to reduce the ecological footprint is gradually enhanced with increased economic development. Finally, the industrial structure, the energy structure, and energy efficiency mediate the impacts of innovation efficiency on the ecological footprint.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does the Belt and Road Initiative Promote Green Innovation Quality? Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Xin, Peizhu
    Zhao, Min
    Bai, Yang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [32] Does green credit promote green sustainable development in regional economies?-Empirical evidence from 280 cities in China
    Bao, Jian
    He, Meiling
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
  • [33] Does GVC embedding reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from 218 Chinese cities
    Li, Guangqin
    Zhang, Xi
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2023, 66 : 253 - 263
  • [34] Does land market matter for urban energy efficiency? Empirical evidence from cities in China
    He, Xiaoping
    Liu, Lingling
    Xu, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 420
  • [35] Do Urban Innovation Policies Reduce Carbon Emission? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities with DID
    Luo, Ling
    Fu, Yang
    Li, Hui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [36] The impact of industrial agglomeration on ecological efficiency: An empirical analysis based on 244 Chinese cities
    Wu, Kun
    You, Kairui
    Ren, Hong
    Gan, Lei
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 96
  • [37] The impact of industrial agglomeration on ecological efficiency: An empirical analysis based on 244 Chinese cities
    Wu, Kun
    You, Kairui
    Ren, Hong
    Gan, Lei
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 96
  • [38] Innovation agglomeration and urban hierarchy: evidence from Chinese cities
    Fan, Fei
    Dai, Shangze
    Zhang, Keke
    Ke, Haiqian
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (54) : 6300 - 6318
  • [39] Does executives' ecological embeddedness predict corporate eco-innovation? Empirical evidence from China
    Peng, Xuerong
    Fang, Pei
    Lee, Seoki
    Zhang, Zeye
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (07) : 1621 - 1634
  • [40] How does green technology innovation affect urban carbon emissions? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Lu, Xinhui
    Lu, Zirui
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 325