Increased Risk of Developing Breast Cancer after a False-Positive Screening Mammogram

被引:28
|
作者
Henderson, Louise M. [1 ,2 ]
Hubbard, Rebecca A. [3 ]
Sprague, Brian L. [4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Weiwei [6 ]
Kerlikowske, Karla [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Off Hlth Promot Res, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, Gen Internal Med Sect, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
DENSITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; COHORT; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0623
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Women with a history of a false-positive mammogram result may be at increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancer. Methods: Using 1994 to 2009 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data, we included women ages 40 to 74 years with a screening mammogram that resulted in a false-positive with recommendation for additional imaging, false-positive with recommendation for biopsy, or true-negative with no cancer within one year following the examination. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards survival models to assess the association between a false-positive mammogram result and subsequent breast cancer, adjusting for potential confounders. Adjusted survival curves stratified by breast density and false-positive result were used to evaluate changes in risk over time. Results: During 12,022,560 person-years of follow-up, 48,735 cancers were diagnosed. Compared with women with a true-negative examination, women with a false-positive with additional imaging recommendation had increased risk of developing breast cancer [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-1.44] as did women with a false-positive with a biopsy recommendation (aHR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.65-1.88). Results stratifying by breast density were similar to overall results except among women with almost entirely fatty breasts in which aHRs were similar for both the false-positive groups. Women with a false-positive result had persistently increased risk of developing breast cancer 10 years after the false-positive examination. Conclusion/Impact: Women with a history of a false-positive screening mammogram or biopsy recommendation were at increased risk of developing breast cancer for at least a decade, suggesting that prior false-positive screening may be useful in risk prediction models. (C) 2015 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1882 / 1889
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Smith, Robert A.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (05) : 429 - 449
  • [42] FALSE-POSITIVE GALACTOSEMIA SCREENING
    SCHON, R
    THALHAMMER, O
    LANCET, 1977, 1 (8001): : 43 - 43
  • [43] High False-Positive Rate with Lung Cancer Screening
    Shaughnessy, Allen F.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 96 (02) : 128 - 129
  • [44] Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features
    Castells, Xavier
    Tora-Rocamora, Isabel
    Posso, Margarita
    Roman, Marta
    Vernet-Tomas, Maria
    Rodriguez-Arana, Ana
    Domingo, Laia
    Vidal, Carmen
    Bare, Marisa
    Ferrer, Joana
    Jesus Quintana, Maria
    Sanchez, Mar
    Natal, Carmen
    Espinas, Josep A.
    Saladie, Francina
    Sala, Maria
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (02) : 379 - 386
  • [45] False-positive result and reattendance in the Ontario breast screening program
    Chiarelli, AM
    Moravan, V
    Halapy, E
    Majpruz, V
    Mai, V
    Tatla, RK
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) : 129 - 133
  • [46] Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization
    Burman, ML
    Taplin, SH
    Herta, DF
    Elmore, JG
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (01) : 1 - +
  • [47] Increased risk of false-positive HIV ELISA results after COVID-19
    Alfie, Laura G.
    Longueira, Yesica S.
    Pippo, Monica
    Cruces, Leonel
    Quiroga, Maria F.
    Turk, Gabriela
    Laufer, Natalia
    AIDS, 2023, 37 (06) : 947 - 950
  • [48] The Cumulative Risk of False-Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test after 10 Years of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Johnson, Eric
    Hsia, Raymond
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (09) : 1612 - 1619
  • [49] Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer
    Gilbert, FJ
    Cordiner, CM
    Affleck, IR
    Hood, DB
    Mathieson, D
    Walker, LG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (13) : 2010 - 2014
  • [50] False-positive screening results in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial
    Kilpelainen, T. P.
    Tammela, T. L. J.
    Maattanen, L.
    Kujala, P.
    Stenman, U-H
    Ala-Opas, M.
    Murtola, T. J.
    Auvinen, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (03) : 469 - 474