An improved Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach model for estimating ecological carbon sequestration in mountain vegetation

被引:8
|
作者
Huang, Xu [1 ,2 ]
He, Li [1 ,3 ]
He, Zhengwei [1 ]
Nan, Xi [4 ]
Lyu, Pengyi [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Ye, Haiyan [6 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Geohazard Prevent & Geoenvironm Prot, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, Sch Earth Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Tourism & Urban Rural Planning, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] PetroChina, Southwest Oil & Gas Field Co, Explorat & Dev Res Inst, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Yongnian Middle Sch, Zigong, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
improve CASA model; ecological carbon sequestration; topographic influence; maximum utilization of light energy; mountainous areas; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; CASA MODEL; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; DRIVING FACTORS; MODIS DATA; NPP; CHINA; TERRESTRIAL; GRASSLANDS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2022.1048607
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The vegetation in mountainous areas is abundant, and its ecological carbon sequestration ability is of great significance to maintain the sustainable and healthy development of the ecological environment. However, when estimating the carbon sequestration of mountain vegetation, the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) model assigns a uniform value to the maximum light energy utilization (epsilon(max) = 0.389 gC/MJ), ignoring the influence of vegetation types and topographic factors on epsilon(max), resulting in the low accuracy of the CASA model in estimating the carbon sequestration of mountain vegetation. In this paper, the improved CASA model was combined with Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) remote sensing image data to improve the estimation accuracy of carbon sequestration of mountain vegetation. The first was the establishment of a linear link between the terrain characteristics (slope and aspect), vegetation types, and epsilon(max) in mountainous locations. The second was the improvement of the CASA model's calculation method for key parameters. The different distributions of the estimation results from the two techniques in 2015 and 2016 are then compared using Landsat 8 data as the data source, and the impact of the terrain factors in the improved CASA model on the estimation results is confirmed. Finally, the improved CASA model and the CASA model are used to estimate the Net Primary Productivity (NPP) of the study area from 2000 to 2020, and the estimated results of the two models are compared with the computation results of the MODIS data NPP product. The findings indicate that the improved CASA model's estimation results have a higher degree of fit and a better correlation. The improved CASA model aids in precisely understanding the ecological carbon sequestration potential of mountain areas and increases the estimation accuracy of vegetation carbon sequestration in mountainous areas.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Combined Simple Biosphere/Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach terrestrial carbon cycle model
    Schaefer, Kevin
    Collatz, G. James
    Tans, Pieter
    Denning, A. Scott
    Baker, Ian
    Berry, Joe
    Prihodko, Lara
    Suits, Neil
    Philpott, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2008, 113 (G3)
  • [2] Estimation of aboveground net primary productivity in secondary tropical dry forests using the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford approach (CASA) model
    Cao, S.
    Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A.
    Duran, S. M.
    Calvo-Rodriguez, S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [3] Improving simulated soil temperatures and soil freeze/thaw at high-latitude regions in the Simple Biosphere/Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach model
    Schaefer, Kevin
    Zhang, Tingjun
    Slater, Andrew G.
    Lu, Lixin
    Etringer, Andrew
    Baker, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2009, 114
  • [4] High temporal and spatial estimation of grass yield by applying an improved Carnegie-Ames-Stanford approach (CASA)-NPP transformation method: A case study of Zhenglan Banner, Inner Mongolia, China
    Sun, Bin
    Qin, Pengyao
    Yue, Wei
    Guo, Ye
    Gao, Zhihai
    Wang, Yan
    Li, Yifu
    Yan, Ziyu
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 224
  • [5] How to Simulate Carbon Sequestration Potential of Forest Vegetation? A Forest Carbon Sequestration Model across a Typical Mountain City in China
    Guan, Dongjie
    Nie, Jialong
    Zhou, Lilei
    Chang, Qiongyao
    Cao, Jiameng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [6] Estimating the value of carbon sequestration ecosystem services in the Mediterranean Sea: An ecological economics approach
    Canu, Donata Melaku
    Ghermandi, Andrea
    Nunes, Paulo A. L. D.
    Lazzari, Paolo
    Cossarini, Gianpiero
    Solidoro, Cosimo
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 32 : 87 - 95
  • [7] Estimation of spatial and temporal changes in net primary production based on Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model in semi-arid rangelands of Semirom County, Iran
    Fatemeh Hadian
    Reza Jafari
    Hossein Bashari
    Mostafa Tartesh
    Kenneth D. Clarke
    [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11 : 477 - 494
  • [8] Estimation of spatial and temporal changes in net primary production based on Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach(CASA) model in semi-arid rangelands of Semirom County, Iran
    Fatemeh HADIAN
    Reza JAFARI
    Hossein BASHARI
    Mostafa TARTESH
    Kenneth D CLARKE
    [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2019, 11 (04) : 477 - 494
  • [9] Estimation of spatial and temporal changes in net primary production based on Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model in semi-arid rangelands of Semirom County, Iran
    Hadian, Fatemeh
    Jafari, Reza
    Bashari, Hossein
    Tartesh, Mostafa
    Clarke, Kenneth D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID LAND, 2019, 11 (04) : 477 - 494
  • [10] Modelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy design: a comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model
    Quijas, Sandra
    Boit, Alice
    Thonicke, Kirsten
    Murray-Tortarolo, Guillermo
    Mwampamba, Tuyeni
    Skutsch, Margaret
    Simoes, Margareth
    Ascarrunz, Nataly
    Pena-Claros, Marielos
    Jones, Laurence
    Arets, Eric
    Jaramillo, Victor J.
    Lazos, Elena
    Toledo, Marisol
    Martorano, Lucieta G.
    Ferraz, Rodrigo
    Balvanera, Patricia
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2018, 15 (01) : 42 - 60