Strengthened multi-stakeholder linkages in valuation studies is critical for improved decision making outcomes for valuable mangroves - The Malaysian case study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Soon Loong [1 ]
Then, Amy Yee-Hui [1 ]
Goh, Hong Ching [2 ]
Hattam, Caroline [3 ]
Edwards-Jones, Andrew [4 ]
Austen, Melanie C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Inst Biol Sci, Fac Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] ICF, Plymouth, England
[4] Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth, England
[5] Univ Plymouth, Fac Sci & Engn, Plymouth Sch Biol & Marine Sci, Plymouth, England
关键词
ecosystem service assessment; policy making; southeast Asia; natural resources; decision making; result dissemination; VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; CONSERVATION; COASTAL; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; VALUES; COST;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2022.1033200
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mangrove forests in Southeast Asia are continuously declining as a result of unsustainable practices, partly due to limited recognition of the value of mangrove services in land use decision making. Valuation practitioners have assumed that monetary valuation should inform local and national decision makers to ensure sustainable management of mangrove resources. For ecosystem service valuation to be of use to decision makers, best practices should be adhered to such as having straightforward policy questions and strong stakeholder engagement from the onset of valuation studies, suitable choice of valuation methodologies, and the ability to effectively demonstrate causal links between drivers of ecosystem health, change, and resource users. This study, focusing on the Malaysian case study, assessed the effectiveness and challenges of local ecosystem service valuation studies in informing mangrove management decisions against a set of global best practices. A systematic review approach was undertaken to identify relevant Malaysian mangrove ecosystem service valuation studies. Of 184 studies identified, only 17 provided monetary values for mangrove ecosystem services. These studies valued nine different mangrove ecosystem services, with the cultural ecosystem services of tourism being the most frequently valued. Most of the valuation studies were designed to raise awareness of the value of ecosystems (64.7%). Other intended uses included determining appropriate charging rates for mangrove uses (17.6%), comparing the costs and benefits of different environmental uses (11.8%), and providing a justification and support for certain decision making (5.9%). Overall, mangrove valuation studies in Malaysia were characterized by weak multi-stakeholder engagement, non-standardized valuation units across the whole country, limited dissemination of the valuation outcome, and cursory references to the potential use of mangrove ecosystem services. Most of the studies did not exert apparent influence on mangrove management. Future valuation studies in Malaysia and the Southeast Asian region should aim to build more robust engagement between valuation practitioners and key stakeholder groups, especially decision makers, at all stages of the study process and incorporate a clear dissemination strategy for sharing results.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [11] The Prioritization of Critical County Municipalities According to Solid Waste Management Urgency by Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches: A Case Study of Florida, US
    Guner, Gurkan Guven
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 264 - 271
  • [12] Improved multi-criteria decision making method integrating machine learning for patent competitive potential Evaluation:A case study in water pollution abatement technology
    Fan, Shuqin
    Liu, Guoxin
    Tu, Yan
    Zhu, Junda
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Tian, Ziyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 403
  • [13] A GIS-Based Adaptive Management Decision Support System to Develop a Multi-Objective Framework: A Case Study Utilizing GIS Technologies and Physically-Based Models to Achieve Improved Decision Making for Site Management
    Coleman, Andre M.
    Wigmosta, Mark S.
    Lane, Leonard J.
    Tagestad, Jerry D.
    Roberts, Damon
    JOURNAL OF MAP & GEOGRAPHY LIBRARIES, 2008, 4 (02) : 269 - 284