The health impacts of waste-to-energy emissions: a systematic review of the literature

被引:26
|
作者
Cole-Hunter, Tom [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johnston, Fay H. [1 ,5 ]
Marks, Guy B. [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Morawska, Lidia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morgan, Geoffrey G. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Overs, Marge [1 ]
Porta-Cubas, Ana [1 ]
Cowie, Christine T. [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Air Pollut Energy & Hlth Res CAR, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Int Lab Air Qual & Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Sci & Engn Fac, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Environm Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales, South West Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Woolcock Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Univ Ctr Rural Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
air pollution; energy; health; incineration; waste; waste-to-energy; SOLID-WASTE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT FACILITY; DURHAM REGION; CANADA; PART; CEMENT KILNS; INCINERATION; LANDFILL; ONTARIO; PLANT;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/abae9f
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste-to-energy (WtE) processes, or the combustion of refuse-derived fuel (RDF) for energy generation, has the potential to reduce landfill volume while providing a renewable energy source. We aimed to systematically review and summarise current evidence on the potential health effects (benefits and risks) of exposure to WtE/RDF-related combustion emissions. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar using terms related to health and WtE/RDF combustion emissions, following PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and then full-texts of original, peer-reviewed research articles published until 20th March 2020, plus their relevant references. Overall quality of included epidemiological studies were rated using an amended Navigation framework. We found 19 articles from 269 search results that met our inclusion criteria, including two epidemiological studies, five environmental monitoring studies, seven health impact or risk assessments (HIA/HRA), and five life-cycle assessments. We found a dearth of health studies related to the impacts of exposure to WtE emissions. The limited evidence suggests that well-designed and operated WtE facilities using sorted feedstock (RDF) are critical to reduce potential adverse health (cancer and non-cancer) impacts, due to lower hazardous combustion-related emissions, compared to landfill or unsorted incineration. Poorly fed WtE facilities may emit concentrated toxins with serious potential health risks, such as dioxins/furans and heavy metals; these toxins may remain problematic in bottom ash as a combustion by-product. Most modelling studies estimate that electricity (per unit) generated from WtE generally emits less health-relevant air pollutants (also less greenhouse gases) than from combustion of fossil fuels (e.g. coal). Some modelled estimates vary due to model sensitivity for type of waste processed, model inputs used, and facility operational conditions. We conclude that rigorous assessment (e.g. HRA including sensitivity analyses) of WtE facility/technological characteristics and refuse type used is necessary when planning/proposing facilities to protect human health as the technology is adopted worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The health impacts of ambient air pollution in Australia: a systematic literature review
    Walter, Clare M.
    Schneider-Futschik, Elena K.
    Lansbury, Nina L.
    Sly, Peter D.
    Head, Brian W.
    Knibbs, Luke D.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 51 (10) : 1567 - 1579
  • [42] Assessment of carbon emissions' effects on the investments in conventional and innovative waste-to-energy treatments
    Colangelo, Gianpiero
    Facchini, Francesco
    Ranieri, Luigi
    Starace, Giuseppe
    Vitti, Micaela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 388
  • [43] Ultrafine particle emissions for municipal waste-to-energy plants and residential heating boilers
    Ozgen, Senem
    Ripamonti, Giovanna
    Cernuschi, Stefano
    Giugliano, Michele
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (04) : 407 - 415
  • [44] A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development
    Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda
    Silva, Valter Bruno
    Cardoso, Joao Sousa
    Brito, Paulo S.
    Tuna, Celso Eduardo
    Silveira, Jose Luz
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 178 : 802 - 820
  • [45] Municipal Waste Management Strategy Review and Waste-to-Energy Potentials in New Zealand
    Perrot, Jean-Francois
    Subiantoro, Alison
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [46] Sustainable utilization of energy from waste: A review of potentials and challenges of Waste-to-energy in South Africa
    Adeleke, Oluwatobi
    Akinlabi, Stephen A.
    Jen, Tien-Chien
    Dunmade, Israel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2021, 18 (14) : 1550 - 1564
  • [47] Emissions from waste-to-energy: A comparison with coal-fired power plants
    Albina, DO
    Themelis, NJ
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND RESOURCES - 2003, 2003, : 169 - 184
  • [48] Ultrafine particle emissions for municipal waste-to-energy plants and residential heating boilers
    Senem Ozgen
    Giovanna Ripamonti
    Stefano Cernuschi
    Michele Giugliano
    [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2012, 11 : 407 - 415
  • [49] Waste-to-Energy: A Midas Touch for Turning Waste into Energy
    Zhang, Long
    Bai, Wuliyasu
    Ren, Jingzheng
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [50] Waste-to-energy conversion technologies in the UK: Processes and barriers - A review
    Foster, William
    Azimov, Ulugbek
    Gauthier-Maradei, Paola
    Molano, Liliana Castro
    Combrinck, Madeleine
    Munoz, Jose
    Esteves, Jaime Jaimes
    Patino, Luis
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135