A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single Injection Versus Catheter Technique

被引:51
|
作者
Lee, Steven [1 ]
Rooban, Nirooshan [1 ]
Vaghadia, Himat [1 ]
Sawka, Andrew N. [1 ]
Tang, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, 899 West 12th Ave,Room 2449, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2018年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
adductor canal block; regional anesthesia; TKA analgesia; peri-neural catheters; dexamethasone; FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; INTRAVENOUS DEXAMETHASONE; PERINEURAL DEXAMETHASONE; PUBLISHED EVIDENCE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PAIN; METAANALYSIS; HIP; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.018
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adductor canal blocks (ACBs) provide effective analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that ACB single injection plus intravenous (IV) dexamethasone (Dex) shows non-inferiority to catheter, while ACB single injection does not. Methods: One hundred eighty patients were randomized and 177 analyzed from among 1 of 3 ACB interventions: (1) 0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL; (2) 0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL plus IV Dex 8 mg; (3) 0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h for 48 hours. The primary endpoint was cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours in oral morphine equivalents, with a non-inferiority limit of 30 mg. Secondary endpoints included opioid consumption at 12 and 48 hours, rest pain scores, quality of recovery survey, length of stay, and anti-emetic usage. Results: For 24-hour opioid consumption, single injection ACB with and without IV Dex had a mean difference of -24.2 mg (confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to -48.9, P < .001) and -21 mg (CI 3.2 to -45.1, P < .001) relative to catheter, demonstrating non-inferiority. Non-inferiority was also shown at 12 hours by Dex and single injection over catheter with mean difference of -20.4 mg (CI -6.8 to -33.9, P < .001) and -15.1 mg (CI -2.1 to -28.2, P < .001), respectively. No intergroup difference was found for 48-hour opioid consumption. No differences in other secondary outcomes were observed across the 3 groups. Conclusion: Single injection ACB, with and without IV Dex, is non-inferior to ACB catheters in 24-hour opioid consumption, and may be attractive options for early-discharge, fast-track total knee arthroplasty. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1051
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative study between surgical wound catheter, femoral nerve block, and adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroplasty: A double blind randomized clinical trial
    El Tallawy, Salah N.
    Ali, Wegdan A.
    Thallaj, Ahmed K.
    Ahmed, Rania S.
    Manaa, Essam M.
    Mostafa, Mohamed S.
    Aljasser, Fawzi F.
    Amlih, Haneen F.
    Hassanin, Abeer A.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 17 (03) : 359 - 367
  • [42] The Effect of Adductor Canal Block on Knee Extensor Muscle Strength 6 Weeks After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Rousseau-Saine, Nicolas
    Williams, Stephan R.
    Girard, Francois
    Hebert, Luc J.
    Robin, Florian
    Duchesne, Luc
    Lavoie, Frederic
    Ruel, Monique
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 126 (03): : 1019 - 1027
  • [43] Comparison of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Early Ambulation After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kukreja, Promil
    Bevinetto, Cara
    Brooks, Brandon
    McKissack, Haley
    Montgomery, Tyler P.
    Alexander, Bradley
    Shah, Ashish
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [44] Efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block before Versus after primary total knee arthroplasty - Does timing make a difference? A randomized controlled trial
    Heller, Snir
    Shemesh, Shai
    Rukinglaz, Oleg
    Cohen, Nir
    Velkes, Steven
    Fein, Shai
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 30 (03)
  • [45] Popliteal plexus block compared with tibial nerve block on rehabilitation goals following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial
    Sakai, Norihiro
    Adachi, Takamasa
    Sudani, Tomoko
    Taruishi, Chieko
    Uematsu, Yuki
    Takada, Motoshi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [46] No Benefit of Adductor Canal Block Compared with Anterior Local Infiltration Analgesia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Pic, Caroline
    Macabeo, Caroline
    Waissi, Emran
    Lasselin, Philippe
    Raffin, Mahe
    Pradat, Pierre
    Lalande, Laure
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Aubrun, Frederic
    Dziadzko, Mikhail
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (03): : 231 - 238
  • [47] Continuous block at the proximal end of the adductor canal provides better analgesia compared to that at the middle of the canal after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Yuda Fei
    Xulei Cui
    Shaohui Chen
    Huiming Peng
    Bin Feng
    Wenwei Qian
    Jin Lin
    Xisheng Weng
    Yuguang Huang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [48] Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard periarticular injections in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial
    Bowen, Joseph
    Rainey, Joshua P.
    Linthicum, Jonathan
    Blackburn, Brenna E.
    Anderson, Lucas A.
    SICOT-J, 2025, 11
  • [49] Continuous block at the proximal end of the adductor canal provides better analgesia compared to that at the middle of the canal after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Fei, Yuda
    Cui, Xulei
    Chen, Shaohui
    Peng, Huiming
    Feng, Bin
    Qian, Wenwei
    Lin, Jin
    Weng, Xisheng
    Huang, Yuguang
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [50] A Comparison of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block vs Femoral Nerve Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ludwigson, Jordan L.
    Tillmans, Samuel D.
    Galgon, Richard E.
    Chambers, Tamara A.
    Heiner, John P.
    Schroeder, Kristopher M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (03): : 741 - 741