The Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Infant Birthweight and Maternal Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:28
|
作者
Tubay, Amy Tanner [1 ]
Manselis, Kate A. [2 ]
Simpson, Matthew J. [3 ]
Armitage, Nicole H. [4 ]
Briscoe, Gabriel [2 ]
Potts, Vicki [5 ]
机构
[1] RAF Lakenheath, Med Grp 48, Bldg 932, Brandon IP27 9PN, Suffolk, England
[2] David Grant USAF Med Ctr, 101 Bodin Circle, Travis AFB, CA 94533 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Denver Sch Med, 13001 E 17th P1, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] 711th Human Performance Wing, 2510 Fifth St,Bldg 840, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[5] John Muir Phys Network Clin Res Ctr, 2700 Grant St,Suite 202, Concord, CA 94520 USA
关键词
PERINATAL OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; PREGNANCY; CENTERINGPREGNANCY; STRESS; DEPLOYMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usy361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Group prenatal care models have been in use in the USA for over 20 years and have shown benefits in reducing rates of preterm birth and low birth weight infants in high-risk civilian populations. Group prenatal care has been widely implemented at military treatment facilities, despite a lack of high-quality evidence for improved perinatal outcomes in this population. Materials and methods: In this randomized, controlled trial, 129 patients at a military treatment facility received either traditional one-on-one prenatal care or group prenatal care using the CenteringPregnancy model. CenteringPregnancy care was administered by certified nurse midwives and family medicine residents and faculty. The primary outcomes were infant birthweight appropriateness for gestational age, maternal anxiety (as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and depression (as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale), and patient satisfaction (as measured by the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire). Infant birthweights were compared using Chi-square tests for the categorical variables of small for gestational age (SGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA), or large for gestational age. Maternal mood and satisfaction scores were evaluated before, during, and after the intervention and analyzed using rank sum tests. Additional demographic and outcome data were collected directly from participants and extracted from patient records. Results: Patients receiving group care were more likely to deliver an infant that was appropriate for gestational age, with an incidence ratio of 1.12 [CI = 1.01-1.25, p = 0.04]. Depression and anxiety levels remained similar between groups throughout the study. Satisfaction was similar between groups, though patients receiving group care reported higher satisfaction with the accessibility and convenience of their care at the study's end [p = 0.048]. There were no differences between groups in preterm births, maternal or neonatal morbidity, mode of delivery, maternal weight gain, or breastfeeding rates. Conclusions: Military parturients receiving group prenatal care in the CenteringPregnancy model were less likely to deliver an small for gestational age or large for gestational age newborn and were more likely to be satisfied with their access to care. Group prenatal care is well received by patients and may positively influence neonatal metabolic status.
引用
收藏
页码:E440 / E446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of a novel positive psychological intervention on prenatal stress and well-being: A pilot randomised controlled trial
    Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
    Dockray, Samantha
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2017, 30 (02) : E111 - E118
  • [22] A randomized controlled trial and pragmatic analysis of the effects of volunteering on the health and well-being of older people
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Jongenelis, Michelle I.
    Jackson, Ben
    Warburton, Jeni
    Newton, Robert U.
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (04) : 711 - 721
  • [23] Saccharide Effects on Cognition and Well-Being in Middle-Aged Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Best, Talitha
    Kemps, Eva
    Bryan, Janet
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 66 - 80
  • [24] A randomized controlled trial and pragmatic analysis of the effects of volunteering on the health and well-being of older people
    Simone Pettigrew
    Michelle I. Jongenelis
    Ben Jackson
    Jeni Warburton
    Robert U. Newton
    [J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2020, 32 : 711 - 721
  • [25] Delivering your daily dose of well-being to the workplace: a randomized controlled trial of an online well-being programme for employees
    Neumeier, Lena M.
    Brook, Libby
    Ditchburn, Graeme
    Sckopke, Philipp
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 26 (04) : 555 - 573
  • [26] Music therapy in palliative care: Results of a randomized, controlled trial on psychophysiological indicators of relaxation and well-being
    Warth, M.
    Kessler, J.
    Hillecke, T. K.
    Bardenheuer, H. J.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 128 - 129
  • [27] Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Diabetes Group Prenatal Care COMMENT
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Barbier, Kate
    Hill, Pamela K.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Macones, George A.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Mazzoni, Sara E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (12) : 715 - 716
  • [28] Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial - Reply
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 993 - 994
  • [29] An Interprofessional Group Intervention to Promote Faculty Well-Being: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Hata, Susan R.
    Berkowitz, Lori R.
    James, Kaitlyn
    Simpkin, Arabella L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2022, 42 (01) : E75 - E82
  • [30] Effect of Educational Intervention on Psychological Well-Being in CRS: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Marlapudi, Sudheer Kumar
    Biradar, Kashiroygoud
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 76 (2) : 1775 - 1784