Unintended consequences of reducing QT-alert overload in a computerized physician order entry system

被引:16
|
作者
van der Sijs, Heleen [1 ]
Kowlesar, Ravi [1 ]
Aarts, Jos [2 ]
Berg, Marc [2 ]
Vulto, Arnold [1 ]
van Gelder, Teun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hosp Pharm, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Computerized physician order entry; Patient safety; Alert override; Computer-assisted drug therapy; Error management; QT prolongation; PROLONGATION; INTERVAL; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-009-0654-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
After complaints of too many low-specificity drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts on QT prolongation, the rules for QT alerting in the Dutch national drug database were restricted in 2007 to obviously QT-prolonging drugs. The aim of this virtual study was to investigate whether this adjustment would improve the identification of patients at risk of developing Torsades de Pointes (TdP) due to QT-prolonging drug combinations in a computerized physician order entry system (CPOE) and whether these new rules should be implemented. During a half-year study period, inpatients with overridden DDI alerts regarding QT prolongation and with an electrocardiogram recorded before and within 1 month of the alert override were included if they did not have a ventricular pacemaker and did not use the low-risk combination cotrimoxazole and tacrolimus. QT-interval prolongation and the risk of developing TdP were calculated for all patients and related to the number of patients for whom a QT-alert would be generated in the new situation with the restricted database. Forty-nine patients (13%) met the inclusion criteria. In this study population, knowledge base-adjustment would reduce the number of alerts by 53%. However, the positive predictive value of QT alerts would not change (31% before and 30% after) and only 47% of the patients at risk of developing TdP would be identified in CPOEs using the adjusted knowledge base. The new rules for QT alerting would result in a poorer identification of patients at risk of developing TdP than the old rules. This is caused by the many non-drug-related risk factors for QT prolongation not being incorporated in CPOE alert generation. The partial contribution of all risk factors should be studied and used to create clinical rules for QT alerting with an acceptable positive predictive value.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 925
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Framework to Develop Computerized Physician Order Entry System for a Medical Specialty
    Ejaz, Sidra
    Khan, Shoab A.
    Khan, Muazzam A.
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITIES: IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE USING ICT, IOT AND AI (IEEE HONET-ICT 2019), 2019, : 130 - 134
  • [32] Evaluation of Computerized Physician Order Entry System—A Satisfaction Survey in Taiwan
    Bey-Hwa Yui
    Wai-Tim Jim
    Marcelo Chen
    Jong-Ming Hsu
    Chieh-Yu Liu
    Ting-Ting Lee
    [J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 2012, 36 : 3817 - 3824
  • [33] Evaluation of pharmacist interventions on a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system
    Toledano, Audrey
    Castagnet, Stephanie
    Benabadji, Zahira
    Chiadmi, Fouad
    Cisternino, Salvatore
    Schlatter, Joel
    Fain, Olivier
    Fontan, Jean-Eudes
    [J]. PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (01): : 73 - 73
  • [34] Methods to evaluate the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system
    Jungreithmayr, Viktoria
    Haefeli, Walter E.
    Seidling, Hanna M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (03) : 780 - 780
  • [35] Antiemetic prescribing practices using a computerized physician order entry system
    Kunal C. Kadakia
    Alexis D. Leal
    Drew K. Seisler
    Rui Qin
    Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder
    Darryl C. Grendahl
    Kristine M. Sorgatz
    Charles L. Loprinzi
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014, 22 : 217 - 223
  • [36] Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system: expectations and experiences of users
    van Doormaal, Jasperien E.
    Mol, Peter G. M.
    Zaal, Rianne J.
    van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
    Kosterink, Jos G. W.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (04) : 738 - 743
  • [37] Computerized physician order entry: Challenges and opportunities
    Shane, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002, 59 (03) : 286 - 288
  • [38] Computerized physician order entry: Helpful or harmful?
    Berger, RG
    Kichak, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2004, 11 (02) : 100 - 103
  • [39] Computerized physician order entry: Friend or foe?
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (03) : 304 - 305
  • [40] Computerized physician order entry in critical care
    Colpaert, Kirsten
    Decruyenaere, Johan
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 27 - 38