Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence

被引:55
|
作者
Murphy, O. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hoy, K. E. [5 ,6 ]
Wong, D. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Bailey, N. W. [5 ,6 ]
Fitzgerald, P. B. [5 ,6 ]
Segrave, R. A. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Alfred, Cent Clin Sch, Monash Alfred Psychiat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Monash Inst Cognit & Clin Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Monash Biomed Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Epworth Healthcare, Epworth Ctr Innovat Mental Hlth, Camberwell, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[8] Monash Univ, Brain & Mental Hlth Res Hub, Sch Psychol Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Monash Biomed Imaging, Monash Inst Cognit & Clin Neurosci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
tDCS; tRNS; DLPFC; EEG; Working memory; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; SERIAL-ADDITION TASK; OSCILLATIONS; GAMMA; TDCS; ENHANCEMENT; MAINTENANCE; COGNITION; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance in healthy individuals, however effects tend to be modest and variable. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can be delivered with a direct-current offset (DC-offset) to induce equal or even greater effects on cortical excitability than tDCS. To-date, no research has directly compared the effects of these techniques on WM performance or underlying neurophysiological activity. Objective: To compare the effects of anodal tDCS, tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on WM performance and task-related EEG oscillatory activity in healthy adults. Methods: Using a between-subjects design, 49 participants were allocated to receive either anodal tDCS (N = 16), high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset (N = 16), or sham stimulation (N = 17) to the left DLPFC. Changes in WM performance were assessed using the Sternberg WM task completed before and 5- and 25-min post-stimulation. Event-related synchronisation/desynchronisation (ERS/ERD) of oscillatory activity was analysed from EEG recorded during WM encoding and maintenance. Results: tRNS induced more pronounced and consistent enhancements in WM accuracy when compared to both tDCS and sham stimulation. Improvements in WM performance following tRNS were accompanied by increased theta ERS and diminished gamma ERD during WM encoding, which were significantly greater than those observed following anodal tDCS or sham stimulation. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential of tRNS + DC-offset to modulate cognitive and electrophysiological measures of WM and raise the possibility that tRNS + DC-offset may be more effective and reliable than tDCS for enhancing WM performance in healthy individuals. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / 1380
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Augmentation of working memory training by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Ruf, Steffen Philipp
    Fallgatter, Andreas J.
    Plewnia, Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [22] Uncertainty and Promise: the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory
    Jantz T.K.
    Katz B.
    Reuter-Lorenz P.A.
    Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2016, 3 (2) : 109 - 121
  • [23] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Verbal Working Memory
    Boehringer, Andreas
    Macher, Katja
    Dukart, Juergen
    Villringer, Arno
    Pleger, Burkhard
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) : 649 - 653
  • [24] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Based Metaplasticity Protocols in Working Memory
    Carvalho, Sandra
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Goncalves, Oscar F.
    Vigario, Ana Rita
    Faria, Marisa
    Silva, Soraia
    do Rego, Gabriel Gaudencio
    Fregni, Felipe
    Leite, Jorge
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (02) : 289 - 294
  • [25] Augmentation of working memory training by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Steffen Philipp Ruf
    Andreas J. Fallgatter
    Christian Plewnia
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [26] A direct comparison of the electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation in healthy subjects
    Kim, Jiheon
    Jang, Kuk-In
    Roh, Daeyoung
    Kim, Hansol
    Kim, Do Hoon
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 1747
  • [27] How effective is transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Perrey, Stephane
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10445): : 2688 - 2689
  • [28] Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Does Not Enhance the Effects of Working Memory Training
    Holmes, Joni
    Byrne, Elizabeth M.
    Gathercole, Susan E.
    Ewbank, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 28 (10) : 1471 - 1483
  • [29] Modulation of Cold Pain Perception by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
    Zandieh, Ali
    Parhizgar, Seyed Ehsan
    Fakhri, Mohammad
    Taghvaei, Mohammad
    Miri, Shahin
    Shahbabaie, Alireza
    Esteghamati, Sadaf
    Ekhtiari, Hamed
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (04): : 345 - 348
  • [30] Assessing the Effect of Simultaneous Combining of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on the Improvement of Working Memory Performance in Healthy Individuals
    Zhao, Rui
    He, Zhao-Yang
    Cheng, Chen
    Tian, Qian-Qian
    Cui, Ya-Peng
    Chang, Meng-Ying
    Wang, Fu-Min
    Kong, Yao
    Deng, Hui
    Yang, Xue-Juan
    Sun, Jin-Bo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16