Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer

被引:21
|
作者
Van Holsbeke, C. [1 ,2 ]
Ameye, L. [3 ]
Testa, A. C. [4 ]
Mascilini, F. [4 ]
Lindqvist, P. [5 ]
Fischerova, D. [6 ,7 ]
Fruehauf, F. [6 ,7 ]
Fransis, S. [8 ]
de Jonge, E. [2 ]
Timmerman, D. [1 ]
Epstein, E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Genk, Belgium
[3] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Clin Ostet & Ginecol, Rome, Italy
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Charles Univ Prague, Gynecol Oncol Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med 1, Prague, Czech Republic
[7] Charles Univ Prague, Gen Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[8] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Pathol, Genk, Belgium
关键词
endometrial cancer; high risk; mathematical models; prediction; MRC ASTEC; CARCINOMA; INFILTRATION; INVASION; MYOMETRIAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/uog.13216
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop and validate strategies, using new ultrasound-based mathematical models, for the prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer and compare them with strategies using previously developed models or the use of preoperative grading only. Methods Women with endometrial cancer were prospectively examined using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound imaging. More than 25 ultrasound, demographic and histological variables were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed: one 'objective' model using mainly objective variables; and one 'subjective' model including subjective variables (i.e. subjective impression of myometrial and cervical invasion, preoperative grade and demographic variables). The following strategies were validated: a one-step strategy using only preoperative grading and two-step strategies using preoperative grading as the first step and one of the new models, subjective assessment or previously developed models as a second step. Results One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the development set and 211 were included in the validation set. The 'objective' model retained preoperative grade and minimal tumor-free myometrium as variables. The 'subjective' model retained preoperative grade and subjective assessment of myometrial invasion. On external validation, the performance of the new models was similar to that on the development set. Sensitivity for the two-step strategy with the 'objective' model was 78% (95% CI, 69-84%) at a cut-off of 0.50, 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) for the strategy with the 'subjective' model and 83% (95% CI, 75-88%) for that with subjective assessment. Specificity was 68% (95% CI, 58-77%), 72% (95% CI, 62-80%) and 71% (95% CI, 61-79%) respectively. The two-step strategies detected up to twice as many high-risk cases as preoperative grading only. The new models had a significantly higher sensitivity than did previously developed models, at the same specificity. Conclusion Two-step strategies with 'new' ultrasound-based models predict high-risk endometrial cancers with good accuracy and do this better than do previously developed models. Copyright (C) 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 595
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying High-Risk Women for Endometrial Cancer Prevention Strategies: Proposal of an Endometrial Cancer Risk Prediction Model
    Kitson, Sarah J.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Crosbie, Emma J.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [22] Preoperative systemic treatment of locally and locoregionally advanced high-risk endometrial cancer
    Kalincsak Judit
    Gocze Peter
    Bohonyi Noemi
    Bardos Nikoletta
    Koppan Miklos
    Kovacs Krisztina
    Toller Gabor Lenard
    Csima Melinda
    Papp Szilard
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2020, 161 (11) : 425 - 433
  • [23] Preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer by expert and non-expert transvaginal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endometrial histology
    Dueholm, Margit
    Hjorth, Ina Marie
    Dahl, Katja
    Marinovskij, Edvard
    Ortoft, Gitte
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 263 : 181 - 191
  • [24] A Novel Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Model for the Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer
    Yang, Xianyue
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Jingshu
    Yang, Jinyan
    Xu, Fangfang
    Liu, Yun
    Zhang, Chaoxue
    Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2024, 50 (12): : 1793 - 1799
  • [25] A new concordance measure for risk prediction models in external validation settings
    van Klaveren, David
    Gonen, Mithat
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (23) : 4136 - 4152
  • [26] Development and external validation of a clinical–radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of LVSI status in patients with endometrial carcinoma
    Jingya Chen
    Xiaorong Wang
    Haoyi Lv
    Wei zhang
    Ying Tian
    Lina Song
    Zhongqiu Wang
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 13943 - 13953
  • [27] Preoperative Tumor Texture Analysis on MRI for High-Risk Disease Prediction in Endometrial Cancer: A Hypothesis-Generating Study
    Micco, Maura
    Gui, Benedetta
    Russo, Luca
    Boldrini, Luca
    Lenkowicz, Jacopo
    Cicogna, Stefania
    Cosentino, Francesco
    Restaino, Gennaro
    Avesani, Giacomo
    Panico, Camilla
    Moro, Francesca
    Ciccarone, Francesca
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    Fanfani, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [28] Assessment of breast cancer risk prediction models in a high-risk population
    Chun, J.
    Schnahel, F.
    Ogunyemi, O.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 272S - 272S
  • [29] Development and external validation of a head and neck cancer risk prediction model
    Smith, Craig D. L.
    Mcmahon, Alex D.
    Lyall, Donald M.
    Goulart, Mariel
    Inman, Gareth J.
    Ross, Al
    Gormley, Mark
    Dudding, Tom
    Macfarlane, Gary J.
    Robinson, Max
    Richiardi, Lorenzo
    Serraino, Diego
    Polesel, Jerry
    Canova, Cristina
    Ahrens, Wolfgang
    Healy, Claire M.
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Holcatova, Ivana
    Alemany, Laia
    Znoar, Ariana
    Waterboer, Tim
    Brennan, Paul
    Virani, Shama
    Conway, David I.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (09): : 2261 - 2273
  • [30] ADJUVANT EXTERNAL BEAM TREATMENT IN HIGH-INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH IMRT
    Krueger, K.
    Wolfensberger, P.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Loessl, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (08) : 536 - 536