Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

被引:8
|
作者
Tachibana, Hidekazu [1 ]
Iida, Shoichi [1 ]
Kondo, Tsunenori [1 ]
Fukuda, Hironori [1 ]
Takagi, Toshio [1 ]
Iizuka, Junpei [1 ]
Hashimoto, Yasunobu [1 ]
Tanabe, Kazunari [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
关键词
Drain placement; Partial nephrectomy; Renal neoplasms; Minimally invasive surgery; Continuous drainage; DRESSINGS; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-015-1094-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Postoperative management of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) without drain placement is common, but the effects on patients are unclear. We investigated the impact of no drain placement after MIPN. We retrospectively studied 194 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy at one academic center. The study group included 46 evaluable patients without drain placement. The quantity of postoperative fluid collection in the perirenal space was calculated using computed tomography. The preoperative and postoperative serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes numbers, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the blood were compared between groups. Drains were placed in 148 (76.3 %) patients who underwent MIPN. The remaining 46 (23.7 %) patients did not have drain placement. Although the average total quantity of fluid discharged from the drain was 214 mL, the average fluid remaining in the perirenal space did not significantly differ with or without drain placement (20.3 vs. 16.8 mL, p = 0.64). The decrease in serum total protein and albumin was significantly greater with drain placement than without (total protein: 18.9 vs. 12.2 %, p < 0.001; and albumin: 24.7 vs. 22 %, p = 0.038). No drain placement also caused markedly greater decreases in lymphocytes and monocytes than did drain placement, whereas neutrophils and CRP did not differ based on drain placement. Analysis of the quantity of fluid collection showed little need for routine drain placement. Not placing a drain after MIPN prevented serum protein loss and possibly accelerated wound-healing immune responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1763 / 1769
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is perinephric drainage essential after partial nephrectomy?
    Thomas Clements
    Jay D. Raman
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2011, 8 : 594 - 595
  • [22] Is hemostatic agent effective and safe in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy?
    Guo, Qiong
    Lin, Yifei
    Zhang, Chenyang
    Leng, Fangqun
    Long, Youlin
    Cheng, Yifan
    Yang, Liu
    Du, Liang
    Huang, Jin
    Liao, Ga
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (17) : 2116 - 2118
  • [23] Achieving zero ischemia in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy surgery
    Hou, Weibin
    Ji, Zhigang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 18 : 48 - 54
  • [24] HISPANO-AMERICAN EXPERIENCE IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Pablo Secin, Fernando
    Castillo Cadiz, Octavio
    Garcia Marchinena, Patricio Aitor
    Jurado Navarro, Alberto
    Rovegno, Agustin
    Autran, Anamaria
    Rodriguez Faba, Oscar
    Palou Redorta, Joan
    Rozanec, Jose
    Featherstone, Marcelo
    Holst, Pablo
    Nunez Bragayrac, Luciano
    Sotelo, Rene
    Faveretto, Ricardo
    Zequi, Stenio
    Alvarez Maestro, Mario
    Martinez Pineiro, Luis
    Villoldo, Gustavo
    Villaronga, Alberto
    Abreu Clavijo, Diego
    Vidal Mora, Ivar
    Finkelstein, Diana
    Monzo Gardiner, Juan Ignacio
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Hernandez Porras, Andres
    Santaella Torres, Felix
    Sanchez Salas, Rodolfo
    Alberto Davila, Hugo
    Villavicencio Mavrich, Humberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E649 - E650
  • [25] Is robotic technology facilitating the minimally invasive approach to partial nephrectomy?
    Dev, Harveer S.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Anderson, Christopher J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (05) : 760 - 768
  • [26] Is hemostatic agent effective and safe in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy?
    Guo Qiong
    Lin Yifei
    Zhang Chenyang
    Leng Fangqun
    Long Youlin
    Cheng Yifan
    Yang Liu
    Du Liang
    Huang Jin
    Liao Ga
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (17) : 2116 - 2118
  • [27] Achieving the "trifecta" with open versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
    Ghavimi, Samrad
    Saarela, Olli
    Pouliot, Frederic
    Rendon, Ricardo A.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Kapoor, Anil
    Moore, Ronald B.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Lavallee, Luke
    Lacombe, Louis
    Fairey, Adrian
    Jewett, Michael
    Liu, Zhihui
    Tanguay, Simon
    Black, Peter C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (05) : 1569 - 1575
  • [28] Partial nephrectomy: Alive and well in an era of minimally invasive surgery
    Broughton, Gregory J.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 412 - 413
  • [29] Achieving the “trifecta” with open versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
    Samrad Ghavimi
    Olli Saarela
    Frederic Pouliot
    Ricardo A. Rendon
    Antonio Finelli
    Anil Kapoor
    Ronald B. Moore
    Rodney H. Breau
    Luke Lavallee
    Louis Lacombe
    Adrian Fairey
    Michael Jewett
    Zhihui Liu
    Simon Tanguay
    Peter C. Black
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1569 - 1575
  • [30] Effect of Visceral Obesity on Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy COMMENT
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Woo, Jason
    UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (03) : 618 - 619