Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis

被引:105
|
作者
Primmer, Eeva [1 ]
Jokinen, Pekka [2 ]
Blicharska, Malgorzata [3 ,4 ]
Barton, David N. [5 ]
Bugter, Rob [6 ]
Potschin, Marion [7 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere UTA, Tampere, Finland
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Swedish Biodivers Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Trondheim, Norway
[6] Part Wageningen Univ & Res, Alterra, Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Environm Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity conservation; Governance; Policy implementation; Arguments; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATION; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biodiversity conservation policies justified with science and intrinsic value arguments have produced disappointing outcomes, and the need for conservation is now being additionally justified with the concept of ecosystem services. However, little, if any empirical attention is paid to ways in which different types of ecosystem service decisions are made, to what arguments are effective in turning policy into practice and further into conservation outcomes and, in general, to how ecosystem services are governed. To close this gap, this paper identifies the different modes of governance in policy implementation from biodiversity and environmental conservation literature and incorporates them in a conceptual model of ecosystem services commonly utilised at present, the cascade model. The resulting conceptual framework encompasses: (1) hierarchical governance; (2) scientific-technical governance; (3) adaptive collaborative governance; and; (4) governing strategic behaviour. This comprehensive framework provides a structure for empirical analysis of ecosystem services governance, which takes into account the people and organisations making decisions, and, in particular, the different arguments that are used when implementing policies. The framework will facilitate holistic ecosystem service analyses and support policies in generating conservation and sustainability impact. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 166
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Fortunes of Ecosystem Services as an International Governance Concept
    Allan, Jen Iris
    Auld, Graeme
    Cadman, Timothy
    Stevenson, Hayley
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2022, 13 (01) : 62 - 75
  • [42] Governance of Ecosystem Services: Lessons learned for sustainable institutions
    Mann, Carsten
    Loft, Lasse
    Hansjuergens, Bernd
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 275 - 281
  • [43] Transforming Research on Recreational Ecosystem Services into Applications and Governance
    Wang, Zhifang
    Jian, Yuqing
    Huang, Zhibin
    Qureshi, Salman
    Cheng, Kexin
    Bai, Zhuhui
    Zhang, Qingwen
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [44] Adaptive governance of riverine and wetland ecosystem goods and services
    Gunderson, Lance H.
    Cosens, Barbara
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 353 - 360
  • [45] The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation
    Turner, R. K.
    Daily, G. C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (01): : 25 - 35
  • [46] A standardised ecosystem services framework for the deep sea
    La Bianca, Giulia
    Rees, Sian
    Attrill, Martin J.
    Lombard, Amanda T.
    McQuaid, Kirsty A.
    Niner, Holly J.
    van Rein, Henk
    Sink, Kerry J.
    Howell, Kerry L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [47] Ecosystem services as an integrative framework: What is the potential?
    Setten, Gunhild
    Brown, Katrina Myrvang
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 75 : 549 - 556
  • [48] Towards a Threat Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Services
    Maron, Martine
    Mitchell, Matthew G. E.
    Runting, Rebecca K.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Keith, David A.
    Watson, James E. M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (04) : 240 - 248
  • [49] Ecosystem services framework for pesticide risk management
    Maltby, Lorraine
    Holt, Alison
    Alix, Anne
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [50] Establishment of Valuation Framework for Agricultural Ecosystem Services
    He, Kung-Hui
    Huang, Yu-Chieh
    Lin, Kuan-Ting
    Chang, I-Ting
    Guo, Horng-Yuh
    Pan, Shu-Yuan
    [J]. Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 68 (03): : 21 - 32