Conventional ventilation versus high-frequency oscillation: Hemodynamic effects in newborn babies

被引:30
|
作者
Simma, B [1 ]
Fritz, M [1 ]
Fink, C [1 ]
Hammerer, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
cardiac performance; high-frequency oscillation; newborns;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200001000-00038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: We conducted a prospective study to assess the hemodynamic effects of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) compared with high-frequency oscillation (HFO) in newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: A total of 18 consecutive term and preterm infants were examined by two-dimensional M-mode and pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Results: Five patients had to be excluded, three of them because of increasing cardiovascular support after initiation of HFO. The remaining 13 infants (seven males, six females) had a median gestational age of 33 wks (range, 25-40) and a birth weight of 2350 g (range, 790-3600). Patients entered the study at 21 hrs (range, 5-69) of life, receiving total maintenance fluid of 90 mL/kg/day (range, 60-120). Five babies (38%) needed continuous inotropic support. HFO was used as a rescue therapy in infants who failed with CMV. In all 13 patients, HFO significantly impaired cardiac performance compared with CMV by decreasing aortic velocity-time integral: median, 10.2 cm (range, 6.0-14.6) vs. 8.3 cm (range, 5.3-12.4; p < .002); stroke volume: median, 3.8 mt (range, 1.6-6.8) vs. 3.2 mt (range, 1.3-5.9; p < .002); and cardiac index: 281 mL/min/kg of body weight (range, 177-579) vs. 200 mL/min/kg of body weight (range, 156-591; p < .002). Fractional shortening was also significantly reduced: median, 0.31% (range, 0.24-0.44) vs. 0.29% (range, 0.20-0.34; p < .01), because of a significantly smaller left ventricular diastolic diameter during HFO: median, 1.4 cm (range, 1.0-1.9) vs. 1.4 cm (range, 0.9-1.8; p < .05), with a median difference of -0.07 cm (range, -0.4-0.2). HFO also causes a significant decrease in heart rate-corrected left ventricular election time: median, 0.25 sec (range, 0.23-0.28) vs. 0.23 sec (range, 0.21-0.26; p < .02) and heart rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcfc): median, 1.3 circ/sec (range, 1.0-1.6) vs. 1.2 circ/sec (range, 0.9-1.4; p < .05). Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (LVESWS; g/cm(2)) remained stable. The correlation between Vcfc and LVESWS did not show any significance (CMV, r(2) = .2; HFO, r(2) = .09). The regression line between Vcfc and LVESWS showed a higher y-intercept and steeper slope during CMV than during HFO. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and left ventricular systolic diameter remained unchanged. Conclusions: In newborn babies, HFO significantly decreased left ventricular cardiac output caused by reduced left ventricular filling and HFO decreased contractility at higher mean airway pressures than with CMV.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 231
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation: hemodynamic effects on lung and heart
    Smailys, Andrea
    Mitchell, Jamie R.
    Doig, Christopher J.
    Tyberg, John V.
    Belenkie, Israel
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2014, 2 (03):
  • [2] HIGH-FREQUENCY VENTILATION IN PREMATURE AND NEWBORN BABIES
    EKERT, WD
    [J]. KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 1984, 196 (04): : 232 - 232
  • [3] High-frequency oscillation versus conventional ventilation following surfactant administration and partial liquid ventilation
    Mrozek, JD
    Bing, DR
    Meyers, PA
    Connett, JE
    Mammel, MC
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1998, 26 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [4] COMBINED CONVENTIONAL VENTILATION WITH HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATION IN NEONATES
    HOSKYNS, EW
    MILNER, AD
    HOPKIN, IE
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1991, 150 (05) : 357 - 361
  • [5] HIGH-FREQUENCY VENTILATION AND CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN NEWBORN BABIES WITH RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    PARDOU, A
    VERMEYLEN, D
    MULLER, MF
    DETEMMERMAN, D
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 19 (07) : 406 - 410
  • [6] High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation: No winner - but no loser
    Truog, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1999, 135 (01): : 9 - 11
  • [7] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF VENTILATION BY HIGH-FREQUENCY BODY-SURFACE OSCILLATION (HFBSO)
    CHARTRAND, DA
    MAAREK, JM
    YE, TH
    CHANG, YK
    CHANG, HK
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1987, 46 (04) : 1425 - 1425
  • [8] LUNG PATHOLOGY FOLLOWING HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATION AND CONVENTIONAL VENTILATION
    HAMILTON, P
    ONAYEMI, B
    GILLAM, J
    SMYTH, J
    BRYAN, AC
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1982, 41 (05) : 1747 - 1747
  • [9] VENTILATION BY HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATION
    BOHN, DJ
    BUTLER, W
    FROESE, AB
    BRYAN, AC
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1979, 38 (03) : 951 - 951
  • [10] VENTILATION BY HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATION
    BOHN, DJ
    MIYASAKA, K
    MARCHAK, BE
    THOMPSON, WK
    FROESE, AB
    BRYAN, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 48 (04) : 710 - 716