The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Correas, JM
Vallet-Pichard, A
Pol, S
Hélénon, O
机构
[1] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Radiol Adulte, F-75743 Paris 15, France
[2] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Hepatol Adulte, F-75743 Paris 15, France
来源
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE | 2004年 / 85卷 / 05期
关键词
ultrasonography; US contrast agents; liver; hepatocellular carcinoma; radiofrequency ablation;
D O I
10.1016/S0221-0363(04)97650-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The incidence of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in Occident, as well as in France. Primary prevention is the only solution for early detection. The combination of ultrasound (US) and alphaFP each 4 to 6 months dosage has many limitations. The sensitivity of US examination is rather poor (less than 70% for lesions below 2 cm in diameter) and serum alphaFP values remain normal in almost 50% of HCC. US contrast agents (USCAs) with perfluorcarbon gases increase the back scattered signals during all phases of the liver transit including arterial, portal and delayed phases. Hepatocellular lesions exhibit a specific kinetics with strong enhancement during arterial phase, and rapid wash-out during portal and delayed phases. USCAs increase the detection of HCCs and allow characterization of additional focal lesions found in cirrhotic livers (regenerative and dysplastic nodules haemangiomas...). Indeed, regenerative modules contrast uptake is synchronous to the Surrounding parenchyma and usually disappear during portal and delayed phases. However, US in cirrhosis remains a difficult examination, with limitations due to limited access to sub-diaphragmatic localization, attenuation of the ultrasound beam and shortness of the arterial phase.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 703
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local ablation therapy with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a practical review
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Khalili, Korosh
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2015, 34 (04) : 235 - 245
  • [32] Predictive factors of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Park, Kil Hyo
    Kwon, Soon Ha
    Lee, Yong Sub
    Jeong, Soung Won
    Jang, Jae Young
    Lee, Sae Hwan
    Kim, Sang Gyune
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Kim, Young Seok
    Cho, Young Deok
    Kim, Hong Soo
    Kim, Boo Sung
    Kim, Yong Jae
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 21 (02) : 158 - 164
  • [34] Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: correlation with microvessel morphology
    Xiao, Ji-Dong
    Zhu, Wen-Hui
    Shen, Shou-Rong
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 9 (06) : 605 - 610
  • [35] Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with SonoVue
    Salvatore, Veronica
    Gianstefani, Alice
    Negrini, Giulia
    Allegretti, Giulia
    Galassi, Marzia
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    LIVER CANCER, 2016, 5 (01) : 55 - 66
  • [36] Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization: Evaluation with parametric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Moschouris, Hippocrates
    Malagari, Katerina
    Marinis, Athanasios
    Kornezos, Ioannis
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Nikas, Georgios
    Papadaki, Marina Georgiou
    Gkoutzios, Panagiotis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 4 (08): : 379 - 386
  • [37] Hepatocellular carcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yu, JS
    Kim, MJ
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (02): : 157 - 167
  • [38] Hepatocellular carcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI
    J.-S. Yu
    M.-J. Kim
    Abdominal Imaging, 2002, 27 : 157 - 167
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced sonography for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Choi, BI
    Lee, JY
    Han, JK
    Lee, JM
    Kim, SH
    INTERVIROLOGY, 2004, 47 (3-5) : 162 - 168
  • [40] CONTRAST-ENHANCED INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASONOGRAPHY OF SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS
    TAKADA, T
    YASUDA, H
    UCHIYAMA, K
    HASEGAWA, H
    SHIKATA, J
    SURGERY, 1990, 107 (05) : 528 - 532