Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review

被引:16
|
作者
Nobels-Janssen, Edith [1 ,2 ]
van der Wees, Philip J. [2 ,3 ]
Verhagen, Wim I. M. [1 ]
Westert, Gert P. [3 ]
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. [2 ]
Boogaarts, Jeroen D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Neurol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Hlth Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-INJURY QOLIBRI; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; SCALE; COSMIN; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; EUROQOL; REGION;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000007618
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are aspects of a patient's health status and are considered important for stimulating patient-centered care. Current outcome measures in clinical care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are insufficient to capture PROs. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in aSAH patients. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature published from inception until October 29, 2018, in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. Eligible studies had to evaluate measurement properties and capture PROs in aSAH patients. The quality of the studies and measurement properties were assessed using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018058566). Results We identified 9 articles that reported the assessment of 7 different disease-specific and generic PROMs used for aSAH patients, including 5 that focused on the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QoL). The methodologic quality of the validation processes used was generally doubtful. None of the PROMs complied with current standards for content validity. Conclusions Due to the low quality of evidence for the measurement properties, the evidence base for selecting a suitable PROM for use with aSAH patients is insufficient. Given the specific long-term consequences of aSAH, we consider a disease-specific PROM the most appropriate, with SS-QoL the most suitable PROM currently available.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1112
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [22] Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
    Piontek, Katharina
    Gabes, Michaela
    Kann, Gesina
    Fechtner, Marie
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [23] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Schoch, Dominic
    Sommer, Rachel
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : 2069 - 2077
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome measures in individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review
    Appelstrand, S. B.
    Robertson, A.
    Sabel, N.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 23 (06) : 885 - 895
  • [25] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review
    Wee, Priscilla Jia Ling
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Loh, Dionne Hui Fang
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Puar, Troy H.
    Ostbye, Truls
    Thumboo, Julian
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Low, Lian Leng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
    Yanpin Fan
    Xin Shu
    Katherine Chiu Man Leung
    Edward Chin Man Lo
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [27] Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Surgery A Systematic Review
    Docter, Shgufta
    Fathalla, Zina
    Lukacs, Michael J.
    Khan, Michaela C. M.
    Jennings, Morgan
    Liu, Shu-Hsuan
    Dong, Susan
    Getgood, Alan
    Bryant, Dianne M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (02): : 185 - 190
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures following gynecomastia correction: a systematic review
    Barone M.
    Cogliandro A.
    Morelli Coppola M.
    Cassotta G.
    Di Stefano N.
    Tambone V.
    Persichetti P.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018, 41 (2) : 109 - 118
  • [29] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Fatigue in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
    Ju, Angela
    Unruh, Mark L.
    Davison, Sara N.
    Dapueto, Juan
    Dew, Mary Amanda
    Fluck, Richard
    Germain, Michael
    Jassal, Sarbjit Vanita
    Obrador, Gregorio
    O'Donoghue, Donal
    Tugwell, Peter
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Ralph, Angelique F.
    Howell, Martin
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 71 (03) : 327 - 343
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric surgery-A systematic review
    Besner, Anne-Sophie
    Ferreira, Julia Loyola
    Ow, Nikki
    Gaffar, Rana
    Guadagno, Elena
    Emil, Sherif
    Poenaru, Dan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 57 (05) : 798 - 812