Lower rates of hypoglycaemia in older individuals with type 2 diabetes using insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100: Results from SWITCH 2

被引:10
|
作者
Heller, Simon R. [1 ]
DeVries, J. Hans [2 ]
Wysham, Carol [3 ]
Hansen, Charlotte T. [4 ]
Hansen, Melissa V. [4 ]
Frier, Brian M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Acad Unit Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Multicare Rockwood Clin, Spokane, WA USA
[4] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Queens Med Res Ctr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2019年 / 21卷 / 07期
关键词
basal insulin; diabetes treatment; elderly; hypoglycaemia; type; 2; diabetes; ADULTS; PEOPLE; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; FREQUENCY; RESPONSES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/dom.13708
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim This study aimed to investigate the safety of insulin degludec (degludec) in relation to age and risk of hypoglycaemia post hoc in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (SWITCH 2 trial). Methods In this crossover study, individuals with T2D who were at risk of hypoglycaemia were randomized to double-blind treatment with degludec or insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) +/- oral antidiabetic drugs. After 32 weeks, patients crossed over to the other treatment. Primary endpoint was number of overall severe (positively adjudicated) or glucose-confirmed (plasma glucose <56 mg/dL; 3.1 mmol/L) symptomatic hypoglycaemia events during the two 16-week maintenance periods. Results For individuals <= 65 (n = 450) and >65 (n = 270) years, baseline median (range) duration of diabetes was 12 (1-40) vs 15 (1-54) years, mean HbA1c was 7.7% vs 7.4% and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 87.0 vs 63.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. No significant differences in HbA1c reduction were seen in individuals <= 65 or >65 years. During both maintenance periods, treatment with degludec lowered rates of hypoglycaemia (overall/nocturnal symptomatic) vs those with glargine U100 in individuals <= 65 (31% vs 43%) and >65 (30% vs 41%) years. With degludec and glargine U100, respectively, six vs nine severe hypoglycaemic events occurred in individuals <= 65 years and four vs eight events occurred in those >65 years. Adverse event rates were 3.2 and 3.3 events/patient-year for individuals <= 65 years and were 3.5 and 4.1 events/patient-year for individuals >65 years with degludec and glargine U100, respectively. Conclusion Treatment with degludec was safe and effective, with a frequency of hypoglycaemia lower than that with glargine U100 in both younger and older individuals (>65 years) with T2D.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1641
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Heart failure with insulin degludec versus glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular disease: DEVOTE 14
    Pratley, Richard E.
    Husain, Mansoor
    Lingvay, Ildiko
    Pieber, Thomas R.
    Mark, Thomas
    Saevereid, Hans A.
    Moller, Daniel Vega
    Zinman, Bernard
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [32] Glycaemic variability and risk for hypoglycaemia on insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes
    Kovatchev, B.
    Meng, Z.
    Breton, M.
    Leroy, B.
    Cali, A.
    Perfetti, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S36 - S37
  • [33] Heart failure with insulin degludec versus glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular disease: DEVOTE 14
    Richard E. Pratley
    Mansoor Husain
    Ildiko Lingvay
    Thomas R. Pieber
    Thomas Mark
    Hans A. Saevereid
    Daniel Vega Møller
    Bernard Zinman
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 18
  • [34] SWITCH 1: Reduced risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 1 diabetes-a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial
    Lane, Wendy
    Bailey, Timothy S.
    Gerety, Gregg
    Gumprecht, Janusz
    Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
    Hansen, Charlotte T.
    Nielsen, Thor Schutt Svane
    Warren, Mark L.
    Fulcher, Gregory R.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 89 : 9 - 9
  • [35] Achieving FPG target without hypoglycaemia: a meta-analysis of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100
    Meneghini, L. F.
    Atkin, S. L.
    Jain, R.
    Mathieu, C.
    Philis-Tsimikas, A.
    Bardtrum, L.
    Tutkunkardas, D.
    Zinman, B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S428 - S428
  • [36] Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on continuous glucose monitoring recorded metrics in people with type 1 diabetes and nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia
    Brosen, J. M. B.
    Agesen, R. M.
    Alibegovic, A. C.
    Andersen, H. U.
    Gustenhoff, P.
    Hansen, T. K.
    Hedetoft, C.
    Jensen, T. J.
    Juhl, C. B.
    Stolberg, C. R.
    Lerche, S. S.
    Norgaard, K.
    Parving, H. -H.
    Tarnow, L.
    Pedersen-Bjergaard, U.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (SUPPL 1) : S330 - S331
  • [37] Insulin degludec vs. Insulin glargine 100 U/ml in diabetes: 2-year results
    Siegmund, T.
    Westrup, D.
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2017, 26 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of the long-acting basal insulin degludec (IDeg) compared with insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) in patients with Type 2 diabetes: evidence from the SWITCH 2 trial
    Evans, M.
    Gundgaard, J.
    Chubb, B.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 : 153 - 153
  • [39] A reduced risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine U100 in Asian insulin-naive patients with T2D
    Yang, Wenying
    Li, Qiang
    Li, Zhengfang
    Yang, Jin-Kui
    Ye, Shandong
    Hansen, Charlotte
    Xu, Hongfei
    Pan, Changyu
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 120 : S115 - S115
  • [40] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC VERSUS INSULIN GLARGINE U100 IN TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS FROM THE PORTUGUESE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE: EVIDENCE FROM THE SWITCH 1&2 TRIALS
    de Arellano Serna, Ramirez A.
    Darba, J.
    Tikkanen, C.
    Conde, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A481 - A481