Retrospective Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Resection of Sigmoid and Rectal Tumors

被引:2
|
作者
Zhao, Zimin [1 ]
Chen, Qingkuang [1 ]
Zheng, Honghong [1 ]
Li, Jianjun [1 ]
Zheng, Shuai [1 ]
Zhao, Enhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chengde Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 36 Nanyingzi St, Chengde 067000, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
sigmoid colon tumor; rectal tumor; natural orifice specimen extraction surgery; COLORECTAL SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2020.0780
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With the development of surgical technology, surgeons are paying more and more attention to minimally invasive procedures such as injury reduction, pain reduction, and beautiful incisions to ensure the effectiveness of surgical treatment. This article discusses the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon and rectal tumors via natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES). Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 39 patients who underwent complete laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon tumor or rectal tumor at Chengde Medical College Hospital between 2018 and 2020, including general patient data (gender, age, body mass index [BMI], etc.), surgery-related data, general postoperative conditions, and postoperative pathological data, were retrospectively analyzed to explore the feasibility and safety of NOSES. Results: The specimens were all removed through the anorectal resection drag out type. The average age of 39 patients was 61.3 +/- 10.2 years, the average BMI was 24.0 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2), the average postoperative hospital stay was 11.2 +/- 4.4 days, 12 patients with sigmoid colon tumors, including 11 malignant tumors and 1 schwannoma, 27 rectal tumors, including 1 rectal villous tubular adenoma, among the 37 patients with malignant tumors, ulcer type 32 cases of adenocarcinoma and 5 cases of mass adenocarcinoma, mean number of lymph nodes detected intraoperatively (11.9 +/- 3.9), mean operative time (162.9 +/- 43.0 minutes), mean operative bleeding (36.9 +/- 13.0 mL), mean time of initial exhaust (4.3 +/- 3.0) days, mean time of laparoscopic drainage tube removal (9.8 +/- 1.4) days, mean time of postoperative feeding (4.4 +/- 3.0) days, the average maximum tumor diameter (3.7 +/- 1.4 cm), and the average distance of the tumor from the anal margin (14.1 +/- 6.1 cm); after surgery, there were two cases of anastomotic fistula. Conclusion: Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon and rectal tumors via natural orifice specimen extraction has the advantages of less pain, reduced incisional complications, good safety, and accurate efficacy in clinical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1231
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma
    X.-M. Zhang
    Z. Wang
    H.-R. Hou
    Z.-X. Zhou
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2015, 19 : 355 - 360
  • [32] Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
    Niu, Z.
    Wei, Y.
    Feng, Q.
    Zhu, D.
    Xu, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 210 - +
  • [33] Development of a machine learning algorithm to predict complications of total laparoscopic anterior resection and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in rectal cancer
    Wei, Ran
    Guan, Xu
    Liu, Enrui
    Zhang, Weiyuan
    Lv, Jingfang
    Huang, Haiyang
    Zhao, Zhixun
    Chen, Haipeng
    Liu, Zheng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Wang, Xishan
    [J]. EJSO, 2023, 49 (07): : 1258 - 1268
  • [34] Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer
    Zhang Xingmao
    Zhou Haitao
    Liang Jianwei
    Hou Huirong
    Hu Junjie
    Zhou Zhixiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1119 - 1124
  • [35] Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer
    Zhang Xingmao
    Zhou Haitao
    Liang Jianwei
    Hou Huirong
    HU Junjie
    Zhou Zhixiang
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 1119 - 1124
  • [36] Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection
    Muhammad, Shan
    Jiang, Zheng
    Fan, Tao
    Tang, QingChao
    Hai, Yang
    Ehsan, Sundas Bint E.
    Bilal, Maimoona
    Zubayraeva, Albina A.
    Gao, YiBo
    He, Jie
    [J]. CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (05)
  • [37] Application of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Urological Surgery
    Zhao, Qinxin
    Wu, Liyuan
    Yang, Feiya
    Han, Sujun
    Xing, Nianzeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (03): : 231 - 235
  • [38] Prime time for the adoption of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction surgery?
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Warrier, Satish
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (7-8) : 1214 - 1215
  • [39] Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction
    Masayuki Hisada
    Kenji Katsumata
    Tetsuo Ishizaki
    Masanobu Enomoto
    Takaaki Matsudo
    Kazuhiko Kasuya
    Akihiko Tsuchida
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (44) : 16707 - 16713
  • [40] Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction
    Hisada, Masayuki
    Katsumata, Kenji
    Ishizaki, Tetsuo
    Enomoto, Masanobu
    Matsudo, Takaaki
    Kasuya, Kazuhiko
    Tsuchida, Akihiko
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (44) : 16707 - 16713