Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging

被引:107
|
作者
Dewey, Marc [1 ]
Teige, Florian [1 ]
Schnapauff, Dirk [1 ]
Laule, Michael [1 ]
Borges, Adrian C. [1 ]
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter [1 ]
Schink, Tania [1 ]
Baumann, Gert [1 ]
Rutsch, Wolfgang [1 ]
Rogalla, Patrik [1 ]
Taupitz, Matthias [1 ]
Hamm, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Radiol, Charite, Sch Med, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main candidates for noninvasive coronary angiography; however, multislice CT, unlike MRI, exposes patients to radiation and an iodinated intravenous contrast agent. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT and MRI for noninvasive detection of clinically significant coronary stenoses (>= 50%). Design: Prospective intention-to-diagnose study. Setting: Single tertiary referral center, Berlin, Germany. Patients: 129 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Interventions: Multislice CT and MRI were both performed within a median of 1 day before conventional coronary angiography, which served as the reference standard. Measurements: Diagnostic performance of multislice CT and MRI. Results: 129 patients completed the study. Altogether, 108 patients with 430 vessels could be examined with both multislice CT and MRI and were used for analysis. In the per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of multislice CT (92% [95% CI, 82% to 96%]) was significantly higher than that of MRI (74% [CI, 61% to 83%]; P = 0.013). The sensitivity for detecting clinically significant stenoses was 82% for multislice CT and 54% for MRI (P < 0.001). Specificity and negative predictive value of multislice CT and MRI in the per-vessel analysis were 90% versus 87% (P = 0.73) and 95% versus 90% (P = 0.032), respectively. The effective radiation dose used with multislice CT (mean, 12.3 mSv [SD, 1.4]) in a consecutive subgroup of 73 patients was not significantly different from that used with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (11.4 mSv [SD, 4.8]) (P = 0.169). Most patients (74%) indicated that they would prefer multislice CT for future diagnostic imaging (P < 0.001). Limitations: This was a single-center study with 129 patients. Conclusions: In patients referred for conventional coronary angiography, multislice CT compares favorably with MRI for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of angiographically silent stenoses by multislice computed tomography
    Kakuta, T
    Kimura, S
    Kuboyama, O
    Yonetsu, T
    Umemoto, T
    Fujiwara, H
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 447 - 447
  • [22] Noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease: the role of magnetic resonance imaging
    Da Luz, PL
    Bertini, PJ
    Parga, JR
    Chagas, ACP
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 251 - 251
  • [23] Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary artery wall imaging - Comparison with multislice computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography
    Yeon, Susan B.
    Sabir, Adeel
    Clouse, Melvin
    Martinezclark, Pedro O.
    Peters, Dana C.
    Hauser, Thomas H.
    Gibson, C. Michael
    Nezafat, Reza
    Maintz, David
    Manning, Warren J.
    Botnar, Rene M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (05) : 441 - 447
  • [24] Multislice computed tomography:: angiographic emulation versus standard assessment for detection of coronary stenoses
    Schnapauff, Dirk
    Duebel, Hans-Peter
    Scholze, Juergen
    Baumann, Gert
    Hamm, Bernd
    Dewey, Marc
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (07) : 1858 - 1864
  • [25] Multislice computed tomography: angiographic emulation versus standard assessment for detection of coronary stenoses
    Dirk Schnapauff
    Hans-Peter Dübel
    Jürgen Scholze
    Gert Baumann
    Bernd Hamm
    Marc Dewey
    [J]. European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1858 - 1864
  • [26] Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses''?
    Burgstahler, Christof
    Schroeder, Stephen
    [J]. HEART, 2007, 93 (11) : 1322 - 1324
  • [27] Coronary Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kantor, Birgit
    Nagel, Eike
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Barkhausen, Joerg
    Gerber, Thomas C.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 34 (04) : 145 - 217
  • [28] Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography
    Achenbach, S
    Giesler, T
    Ropers, D
    Ulzheimer, S
    Derlien, H
    Schulte, C
    Wenkel, E
    Moshage, W
    Bautz, W
    Daniel, WG
    Kalender, WA
    Baum, U
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (21) : 2535 - 2538
  • [29] Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging IN RESPONSE
    Dewey, Marc
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (12) : 828 - 829
  • [30] Detection of anomalous origins of the coronary artery by means of multislice computed tomography
    Sato, Y
    Inoue, F
    Matsumoto, N
    Tani, S
    Takayama, T
    Yoda, S
    Kunimasa, T
    Ishii, N
    Uchiyama, T
    Saito, S
    Tanaka, H
    Furuhashi, S
    Takahashi, M
    Koyama, Y
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (03) : 320 - 324