Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging

被引:107
|
作者
Dewey, Marc [1 ]
Teige, Florian [1 ]
Schnapauff, Dirk [1 ]
Laule, Michael [1 ]
Borges, Adrian C. [1 ]
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter [1 ]
Schink, Tania [1 ]
Baumann, Gert [1 ]
Rutsch, Wolfgang [1 ]
Rogalla, Patrik [1 ]
Taupitz, Matthias [1 ]
Hamm, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Radiol, Charite, Sch Med, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main candidates for noninvasive coronary angiography; however, multislice CT, unlike MRI, exposes patients to radiation and an iodinated intravenous contrast agent. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT and MRI for noninvasive detection of clinically significant coronary stenoses (>= 50%). Design: Prospective intention-to-diagnose study. Setting: Single tertiary referral center, Berlin, Germany. Patients: 129 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Interventions: Multislice CT and MRI were both performed within a median of 1 day before conventional coronary angiography, which served as the reference standard. Measurements: Diagnostic performance of multislice CT and MRI. Results: 129 patients completed the study. Altogether, 108 patients with 430 vessels could be examined with both multislice CT and MRI and were used for analysis. In the per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of multislice CT (92% [95% CI, 82% to 96%]) was significantly higher than that of MRI (74% [CI, 61% to 83%]; P = 0.013). The sensitivity for detecting clinically significant stenoses was 82% for multislice CT and 54% for MRI (P < 0.001). Specificity and negative predictive value of multislice CT and MRI in the per-vessel analysis were 90% versus 87% (P = 0.73) and 95% versus 90% (P = 0.032), respectively. The effective radiation dose used with multislice CT (mean, 12.3 mSv [SD, 1.4]) in a consecutive subgroup of 73 patients was not significantly different from that used with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (11.4 mSv [SD, 4.8]) (P = 0.169). Most patients (74%) indicated that they would prefer multislice CT for future diagnostic imaging (P < 0.001). Limitations: This was a single-center study with 129 patients. Conclusions: In patients referred for conventional coronary angiography, multislice CT compares favorably with MRI for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses
    Marc Dewey
    Wolfgang Rutsch
    Bernd Hamm
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 8
  • [2] Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses
    Dewey, Marc
    Rutsch, Wolfgang
    Hamm, Bernd
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [3] Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging -: Complementary use in noninvasive coronary angiography
    Langer, C
    Wiemer, M
    Peterschröder, A
    Franzke, K
    Meyer, H
    Horstkotte, D
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (23) : E343 - E344
  • [4] Noninvasive coronary angiography by magnetic resonance imaging, electron-beam computed tomography, and multislice computed tomography
    Achenbach, S
    Ropers, D
    Regenfus, M
    Pohle, K
    Giesler, T
    Moshage, W
    Daniel, WG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (2A): : 70E - 73E
  • [5] Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: Value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography
    Maintz, D.
    Ozgun, M.
    Hoffmeier, A.
    Quante, M.
    Fischbach, R.
    Manning, W. J.
    Heindel, W.
    Botnar, R. M.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (09) : 967 - 973
  • [6] Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis by multislice helical computed tomography
    Knez, A
    Becker, C
    Ohnesorge, B
    Haberl, R
    Reiser, M
    Steinbeck, G
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (23) : E221 - E222
  • [7] Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Focusing on Calcification: Multislice Computed Tomography Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Langer, Christoph
    Peterschroeder, Andreas
    Franzke, Krista
    Esdorn, Hermann
    Koerperich, Hermann
    Meyer, Hans
    Horstkotte, Dieter
    Wiemer, Marcus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [8] Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery remodeling by multislice computed tomography
    Kakuta, T
    Kimura, S
    Kuboyama, O
    Yonetsu, T
    Goya, M
    Nagata, Y
    Suzuki, K
    Iesaka, Y
    Fujiwara, H
    Isobe, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 319A - 319A
  • [9] Noninvasive estimation of organ weights by postmortem magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography
    Jackowski, C
    Thali, MJ
    Buck, U
    Aghayev, E
    Sonnenschein, M
    Yen, K
    Dirnhofer, R
    Vock, P
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (07) : 572 - 578
  • [10] Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses
    Knez, A
    Becker, CR
    Leber, A
    Ohnesorge, B
    Becker, A
    White, C
    Haberl, R
    Reiser, MF
    Steinbeck, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (10): : 1191 - +