Comparative study of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, X [1 ]
Xu, M [1 ]
Shi, HW [1 ]
Mu, XW [1 ]
Chen, ZQ [1 ]
Qiu, ZB [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Hosp 1, Nanjing Heart Inst, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Nanjing 210006, Peoples R China
关键词
OPCAB; multiple-vessel disease; complete revascularization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Studies on selected patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery have produced inconsistent results, especially in patients with multiple coronary artery disease. This study compared the clinical results of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease. Methods A total of 300 consecutive isolated, multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients were assigned to the off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB, n = 150) or CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCABG, n = 150) groups. There were no significant differences regarding degree of angina, history of myocardial infarction or diabetes, and presence of left main coronary artery disease between the two groups. Ejection fraction in the OPCAB group before surgery was lower than in the CCABG group (P<0.01). In addition, more patients had a history of stroke and abnormal renal function preoperatively in the OPCAB group (P<0.01). In OPCAB patients, single deep pericardial stay suture with a sling snared down was used to expose the target vessels, along with a stabilizer and a coronary shunt. A Medi-Stim Butterfly Flowmeter was used to measure blood flow through grafts in both groups. Results No OPCAB patient was converted to the CCABG group. The average numbers of distal anastomoses and the indexes of completeness of revascularization (ICR) were similar in both groups. Postoperative respiratory support time and the volumes of chest tube drainage and of blood transfusions were less in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P<0.01). The postoperative incidences of pulmonary dysfunction and renal insufficiency were lower in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mortality and other causes of morbidity (periopetative myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation). Conclusions OPCAB can be applied to patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease and can achieve similar completeness of revascularization and similar early surgical results, with shorter respiratory support, reduced transfusion requirement, and fewer cases of pulmonary dysfunction and abnormal renal function.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 346
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft in women
    Barros de Oliveira Sa, Michel Pompeu
    Lima, Leonardo Pontual
    de Rueda, Fabio Goncalves
    de Escobar, Rodrigo Renda
    Ferraz Cavalcanti, Paulo Ernando
    da Silva The, Emmanuel Callou
    Soares de Escobar, Mozart Augusto
    Lima, Ricardo de Carvalho
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2010, 25 (02): : 238 - 244
  • [22] Metabolomic profiling in patients undergoing Off-Pump or On-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    H. Kirov
    M. Schwarzer
    S. Neugebauer
    G. Faerber
    M. Diab
    T. Doenst
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17
  • [23] Role of coronary collaterals in off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Nathoe, HM
    Buskens, E
    Jansen, EWL
    Suyker, WJL
    Stella, PR
    Lahpor, JR
    van Boven, WJ
    van Dijk, D
    Diephuis, JC
    Borst, C
    Moons, KGM
    Grobbee, DE
    de Jaegere, PPT
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (13) : 1738 - 1742
  • [24] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with actively treated diabetes and multivessel coronary disease
    Benedetto, Umberto
    Caputo, Massimo
    Vohra, Hunaid
    Davies, Alan
    Hillier, James
    Bryan, Alan
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 152 (05): : 1321 - +
  • [25] Monocyte activation in on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Greilich, Philip E.
    Brouse, Chad F.
    Rinder, Henry M.
    Jessen, Michael E.
    Rinder, Christine S.
    Eberhart, Robert C.
    Whitten, Charles W.
    Smith, Brian R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2008, 22 (03) : 361 - 368
  • [26] On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Elderly Patients Results From the Danish On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Randomization Study
    Houlind, Kim
    Kjeldsen, Bo Juul
    Madsen, Susanne Norgaard
    Rasmussen, Bodil Steen
    Holme, Susanne Juel
    Nielsen, Per Hostrup
    Mortensen, Poul Erik
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (20) : 2431 - +
  • [27] On-pump or off-pump? Impact of risk scores in coronary artery bypass surgery
    Vilca Mejia, Omar Asdrubal
    Ferreira Lisboa, Luiz Augusto
    Puig, Luiz Boro
    Pinho Moreira, Luiz Felipe
    Oliveira Dallan, Luis Alberto
    Jatene, Fabio Biscegli
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2012, 27 (04): : 503 - 511
  • [28] Surgeons' Preference for Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery
    Fan, Guangpu
    Wang, Xuan
    Chen, Chen
    Liu, Jing
    Chen, Yu
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2021, 24 (03): : E422 - E426
  • [29] On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.
    Shroyer, A. Laurie
    Grover, Frederick L.
    Hattler, Brack
    Collins, Joseph F.
    McDonald, Gerald O.
    Kozora, Elizabeth
    Lucke, John C.
    Baltz, Janet H.
    Novitzky, Dimitri
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (19): : 1827 - 1837
  • [30] CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: OFF-PUMP VERSUS ON-PUMP APPROACH
    Hussain, Raheel
    Soomro, Tariq Ishaq
    PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 40 (3-4): : 47 - 55