The role of Desmodium intortum, Brachiaria sp. and Phaseolus vulgaris in the management of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize cropping systems in Africa

被引:21
|
作者
Scheidegger, Laetitia [1 ]
Niassy, Saliou [2 ]
Midega, Charles [2 ]
Chiriboga, Xavier [2 ]
Delabays, Nicolas [1 ]
Lefort, Francois [1 ]
Zurcher, Roger [1 ]
Hailu, Girma [2 ]
Khan, Zeyaur [2 ]
Subramanian, Sevgan [2 ]
机构
[1] Haute Ecole Paysage Ingn & Architecture Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol, POB 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
intercropping; push-pull; legume; deterrent; Lepidoptera; maize; PUSH-PULL; PLANT DEFENSE; LEPIDOPTERA; STRIGA; STEMBORERS; RESISTANCE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/ps.6261
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a serious pest of maize. Farming systems such as push-pull or maize-legume intercropping have been reported to reduce FAW infestations significantly. However, the exact mechanisms involved in FAW management have not been practically elucidated. We therefore assessed larval host preference, feeding and survival rate when exposed to four host plants commonly used in push-pull and legume intercropping. We also compared adult moths' oviposition preference between maize and other grasses used as trap crops in push-pull. RESULTS: The larval orientation and settlement study showed that maize was the most preferred host plant followed by bean, desmodium and Brachiaria brizantha cv Mulato II. The larval arrest and dispersal experiment showed that mean number of larvae was significantly higher on maize than on Desmodium or B. brizantha cv Mulato II. However, no significant differences were found between maize and bean after 24 h. Maize was the most consumed plant, followed by bean, desmodium and finally brachiaria. The mean percentage of survival to the pupation stage was significantly higher on maize. The study on FAW oviposition preference showed no significant differences in egg deposited between maize and other grasses. However, B. brizantha cv Xaraes, which received more eggs than maize, could be a promising alternative to B. brizantha cv Mulato II for the control of FAW. CONCLUSION: The study provides a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the control of fall armyworm under the push-pull and maize legume intercropping.
引用
收藏
页码:2350 / 2357
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biocontrol-based management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Indian Maize
    Richa Varshney
    B. Poornesha
    A. Raghavendra
    Y. Lalitha
    V. Apoorva
    B. Ramanujam
    R. Rangeshwaran
    K. Subaharan
    A. N. Shylesha
    N. Bakthavatsalam
    Malvika Chaudhary
    Vinod Pandit
    [J]. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2021, 128 : 87 - 95
  • [32] Investigation on the insecticidal activities of cyanobacterial extracts as an alternative source for the management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Sharanappa, C. H.
    Bheemanna, M.
    Prabhuraj, A.
    Naik, Harischandra R.
    Naik, Nagaraj M.
    Rao, Saroja N.
    Moussa, Ihab Mohamed
    Alsubki, Roua A.
    Ullah, Fazal
    Elansary, Hosam O.
    Kariyanna, B.
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [33] Efficacy of Thai indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes for controlling fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) (J. E. Smith)(Lepidoptera; Noctuidae)
    Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen
    Ongpo Lepcha
    Apichat Vitta
    Det Wattanachaiyingcharoen
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 31
  • [34] Performance of Two Trichogrammatid Species from Zambia on Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Sun, Jia-Wei
    Hu, Hong-Ying
    Nkunika, Phillip O. Y.
    Dai, Peng
    Xu, Wei
    Bao, He-Ping
    Desneux, Nicolas
    Zang, Lian-Sheng
    [J]. INSECTS, 2021, 12 (10)
  • [35] Efficacy of Thai indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes for controlling fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) (J. E. Smith)(Lepidoptera; Noctuidae)
    Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Wandee
    Lepcha, Ongpo
    Vitta, Apichat
    Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Det
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL, 2021, 31 (01)
  • [36] Parasitic behavior of Pyemotes zhonghuajia (Trombidiformes: Pyemotidae) on fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Feng, Bing-Xia
    Tian, Tai-An
    Tian, Yu
    Song, Yan-Fei
    Tang, Xiao-Tian
    Yang, Mao-Fa
    Liu, Jian-Feng
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED ACAROLOGY, 2022, 27 (09) : 1745 - 1754
  • [37] Farmers' Knowledge and Management Practices of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in Benin, West Africa
    Houngbo, Sidol
    Zannou, Afio
    Aoudji, Augustin
    Sossou, Herve C.
    Sinzogan, Antonio
    Sikirou, Rachidatou
    Zossou, Esperance
    Vodounon, Henri S. Totin
    Adomou, Aristide
    Ahanchede, Adam
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10): : 1 - 15
  • [38] Mortality Evaluation of Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith) by using Metarhizium anisopliae In vitro
    Romero-Arenas, O.
    Rivera, A.
    Aragon, A.
    Parraguirre, C.
    Cabrera, E.
    Lopez, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 59 - 67
  • [39] Bioefficacy, persistent toxicity, and persistence of translocated residues of seed treatment insecticides in maize against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda(J. E. Smith, 1797)
    Suganthi, A.
    Krishnamoorthy, S. V.
    Sathiah, N.
    Rabindra, R. J.
    Muthukrishnan, N.
    Jeyarani, S.
    kumar, S. Vasantha
    Karthik, P.
    Selvi, C.
    Kumar, G. Arul
    Srinivasan, T.
    Harishankar, K.
    Bhuvaneswari, K.
    Vinothkumar, B.
    Shanmugam, P.
    Bhaskaran, V.
    Prabakar, K.
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2022, 154
  • [40] Interaction of silicon with growth regulating insecticide in the management of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. SMITH, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in corn plants
    Pereira Neri, Danila Kelly
    Moraes, Jair Campos
    Gavino, Marcio Augusto
    [J]. CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2005, 29 (06): : 1167 - 1174