Restraints in daily care for people with moderate intellectual disabilities

被引:7
|
作者
Van der Meulen, Anne Pier S. [1 ]
Hermsen, Maaike A. [1 ]
Embregts, Petri J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Ethics; intellectual disabilities; morality; restraints on freedom; support staff; STAFF; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/0969733016638141
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Self-determination is an important factor in improving the quality of life of people with moderate intellectual disabilities. A focus on self-determination implies that restraints on the freedom of people with intellectual disabilities should be decreased. In addition, according to the Dutch Care and Coercion bill, regular restraints of freedom, such as restrictions on choice of food or whom to visit, should be discouraged. Such restraints are only allowed if there is the threat of serious harm for the clients or their surroundings. Research question: What do support staff consider as restraints on freedom and how do they justify these restraints? Research design: In this study, data were collected by semi-structured interviews. Participants and research context: Fifteen support staff working with clients with moderate intellectual disabilities were interviewed. All participants work within the same organisation for people with intellectual disabilities in the Eastern part of the Netherlands. Ethical considerations: The study was conducted according to good scientific inquiry guidelines and ethical approval was obtained from a university ethics committee. Findings: Most restraints of freedom were found to be centred around the basic elements in the life of the client, such as eating, drinking and sleeping. In justifying these restraints, support staff said that it was necessary to give clarity in what clients are supposed to do, to structure their life and to keep them from danger. Discussion: In the justification of restraints of freedom two ethical viewpoints, a principle-guided approach and an ethics of care approach, are opposing one other. Here, the self-determination theory can be helpful, while it combines the autonomy of the client, relatedness to others and the client's competence. Conclusion: Despite the reasonable grounds support staff gave for restraining, it raises the question whether restraints of freedom are always in the interest of the client.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 68
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Socioemotional understanding and frequent aggression in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities
    Jahoda, A
    Pert, C
    Trower, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION, 2006, 111 (02): : 77 - 89
  • [32] Transforming care for people with intellectual disabilities and autism in England
    Taylor, John L.
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 8 (11): : 942 - 944
  • [33] Social support for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: Participants' perspectives
    Carnaby, S
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2000, 44 : 233 - 233
  • [34] Staff perceptions of daily ethical challenges in the interaction with people with intellectual disabilities
    Ostby, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 783 - 783
  • [35] Motor activation in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in daily practice
    van der Putten, Annette A. J.
    Bossink, Leontien W. M.
    Frans, Niek
    Houwen, Suzanne
    Vlaskamp, Carla
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2017, 42 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [36] Adaptable Mobile Software for Supporting Daily Activities of People with Intellectual Disabilities
    Shabalina, Olga
    Guriev, Vladislav
    Kosyakov, Stanislav
    Voronina, Angelina
    Moffat, David C.
    CREATIVITY IN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES AND DATA SCIENCE, PT II, 2019, 1084 : 474 - 484
  • [37] EXPERIENCES WITH THE USE OF A SOCIAL ROBOT IN THE DAILY SUPPORT OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
    Zaagsma, M.
    Koning, M.
    Kuiper, X.
    Volkers, K.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (10) : 956 - 957
  • [39] People with intellectual disabilities
    Cooper, SA
    Melville, C
    Morrison, J
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7463): : 414 - 415
  • [40] MORAL CASE DELIBERATION AS AN INSTRUMENT TO INCREASE AWARENESS OF THE PERSPECTIVE ON DAILY RULES OF PEOPLE WITH MODERATE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND THEIR SELF-REALISATION
    van derMeulen, A. P.
    Taminiau, E.
    Nijs, S.
    Hertogh, C.
    Embregts, P.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 833 - 834