Does stakeholder engagement through corporate social and environmental behaviors affect innovation?

被引:31
|
作者
Bendell, Bari L. [1 ]
Huvaj, M. Nesij [1 ]
机构
[1] Suffolk Univ, Sawyer Business Sch, Management & Entrepreneurship Dept, 73 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02108 USA
关键词
Innovation; Stakeholder engagement; CSR; Corporate environmental behavior; Corporate social behavior; Fortune; 500; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MANAGEMENT TEAM HETEROGENEITY; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; TOP-MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; CEO CHARACTERISTICS; MODERATING ROLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Firms often engage with their internal and external stakeholders to enrich their knowledge base and augment innovation. An important yet under-examined mechanism to tap into knowledge stakeholders can provide is corporate social and environmental behaviors (CSEB) that firms undertake. This study examines the impact of stakeholder engagement through CSEB on firm investment in innovation. Drawing arguments from the knowledge-based view (KBV), stakeholder theory, and the upper echelons perspective, we argue that undertaking higher levels of corporate social and environmental behaviors lead to better innovation outcomes through different pathways. We test our proposed model on a sample of Fortune 500 firms and find that while corporate social behaviors (CSB) have a direct positive effect on firms' subsequent R&D investments, the impact of corporate environmental behaviors (CEB) on innovation is conditioned by executive tenure. We contribute to innovation, CSB, and CEB literatures by clarifying different mechanisms through which CSB and CEB impact innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 696
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate Social Strategy: Stakeholder Engagement and Competitive Advantage
    Doh, Jonathan
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (04) : 776 - 778
  • [22] Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective
    Zou, Jie
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2015, 9 (03) : 371 - 399
  • [23] Stakeholder pressure, corporate environmental ethics and green innovation
    Rui, Zhengyun
    Lu, Yurong
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2021, 29 (01) : 70 - 86
  • [24] How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Corporate Productivity? The Role of Environmental Regulation
    Hou, Jinyao
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [25] How does stakeholder engagement through environmental, social, and governance affect eco-efficiency and profitability efficiency? Zooming into Apple Inc.'s counterparts
    Lu, Wen-Min
    Kweh, Qian Long
    Ting, Irene Wei Kiong
    Ren, Chunya
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (01) : 587 - 601
  • [26] Does corporate social responsibility and environmental governance drive green innovation?
    Khurshid, Adnan
    Ying, Hongbin
    Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
    Saleem, Sardar Fawad
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [27] Environmental management systems and environmental product innovation: The role of stakeholder engagement
    Papagiannakis, Giorgos
    Voudouris, Irini
    Lioukas, Spyros
    Kassinis, George
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (06) : 939 - 950
  • [28] The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives
    Yin, Jianhua
    Wang, Sen
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (08) : 905 - 919
  • [29] Stakeholder engagement: Investors' environmental risk aversion and corporate earnings
    Kyaw, Khine
    Olugbode, Mojisola
    Petracci, Barbara
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) : 1220 - 1231
  • [30] Connecting strategic orientation, innovation strategy, and corporate sustainability: A model for sustainable development through stakeholder engagement
    van Lieshout, Johannes W. F. C.
    Nijhof, Andre H. J.
    Naarding, Gijs J. W.
    Blomme, Robert J.
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (08) : 4068 - 4080