Carbon Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants: Solvent Performance Comparison at an Industrial Scale

被引:11
|
作者
Sharifzadeh, Mahdi [1 ]
Shah, Nilay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Chem Engn, CPSE, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
CO2; carbon capture; natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant; energy efficiency; integrated process design and control; GCCmax; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; STRIPPER CONFIGURATIONS; INTEGRATED DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; DIOXIDE;
D O I
10.1002/aic.15072
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Natural gas is an important source of energy. This article addresses the problem of integrating an existing natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant with a carbon capture process using various solvents. The power plant and capture process have mutual interactions in terms of the flue gas flow rate and composition vs. the extracted steam required for solvent regeneration. Therefore, evaluating solvent performance at a single (nominal) operating point is not indicative and solvent performance should be considered subject to the overall process operability and over a wide range of operating conditions. In the present research, a novel optimization framework was developed in which design and operation of the capture process are optimized simultaneously and their interactions with the upstream power plant are fully captured. The developed framework was applied for solvent comparison which demonstrated that GCCmax, a newly developed solvent, features superior performances compared to the monoethanolamine baseline solvent. (C) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 179
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integration of SEWGS for carbon capture in Natural Gas Combined Cycle. Part B: Reference case comparison
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    Macchi, Ennio
    Binotti, Marco
    Gazzani, Matteo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (02) : 214 - 225
  • [32] Assessing the potential of molten carbonate fuel cell-based schemes for carbon capture in natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants
    Spinelli, M.
    Di Bona, D.
    Gatti, M.
    Martelli, E.
    Vigano, F.
    Consonni, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2020, 448
  • [33] Solvent Screening and Feasible Study of Retrofitting CO2 Capture System for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant
    Saito, Satoshi
    Egami, Norihide
    Kiyokuni, Toshihisa
    Udatsu, Mitsuru
    Kitamura, Hideo
    Kato, Yasuhiro
    Muramatsu, Takehiko
    Shen Yuhui
    Sun Luchang
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 2394 - 2401
  • [34] Performance characteristics of an integrated power generation system combining gas turbine combined cycle, carbon capture and methanation
    Won, Dong Hyeok
    Kim, Min Jae
    Lee, Jae Hong
    Kim, Tong Seop
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (10) : 4333 - 4344
  • [35] Performance characteristics of an integrated power generation system combining gas turbine combined cycle, carbon capture and methanation
    Dong Hyeok Won
    Min Jae Kim
    Jae Hong Lee
    Tong Seop Kim
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34 : 4333 - 4344
  • [36] Performance characteristics of an integrated power generation system combining gas turbine combined cycle, carbon capture and methanation
    Won, Dong Hyeok
    Kim, Min Jae
    Lee, Jae Hong
    Kim, Tong Seop
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34 (10): : 4333 - 4344
  • [37] Process integration of solar thermal energy with natural gas combined cycle carbon capture
    Lambert, Tristan
    Hoadley, Andrew
    Hooper, Barry
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 248 - 253
  • [38] Energy and economic analysis of the CO2 capture from flue gas of combined cycle power plants
    Vaccarelli, Maura
    Carapellucci, Roberto
    Giordano, Lorena
    [J]. ATI 2013 - 68TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 45 : 1165 - 1174
  • [39] Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from US Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants
    Psarras, Peter
    He, Jiajun
    Pilorge, Helene
    McQueen, Noah
    Jensen-Fellows, Alexander
    Kian, Kourosh
    Wilcox, Jennifer
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (10) : 6272 - 6280
  • [40] Economic comparison between coal-fired and liquefied natural gas combined cycle power plants considering carbon tax: Korean case
    Jeong, Suk-Jae
    Kim, Yung-Sup
    Park, Jin-Won
    Lim, Dong-soon
    Lee, Seung-moon
    [J]. ENERGY, 2008, 33 (08) : 1320 - 1330