Evaluation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness during a standardized breakfast test: comparison with the minimal model analysis of an intravenous glucose tolerance test

被引:32
|
作者
Aloulou, K [1 ]
Brun, JF [1 ]
Mercier, J [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lapeyronie, CERAMM, Serv Cent Physiol Clin, Metab Unit, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
来源
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 2006年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.metabol.2006.01.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is a need for reliable measurements of insulin sensitivity (SI) simpler than the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp or the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), which could be used when the simpler surrogates based on fasting insulin (I-b) and glucose ( GO lose their validity. Several evaluations of SI derived front oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or its physiologic form, the standardized breakfast test (SBT), have been proposed. We aimed at determining which SBT-derived measurements of SI give the best prediction of the values obtained with the minimal model analysis of an IVGTT. Twenty-eight subjects (23 females and 5 males; age, 44.3 +/- 0.6 years) with a wide range of glucose tolerance randomly underwent a hyperglucidic SBT and an IVGTT with minimal model analysis. Correlations of 35 indices (converted if appropriated into similar units) with IVGTT-derived SI were calculated, and the accuracy of the empiric formulas obtained with the I I best predictions were evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. Subjects covered all the spectrum of SI between 0.19 and 21.3 min(-1)/(mu U - mL(-1)) X 10(-4). Eight procedures yielded satisfactory predictions of minimal model SI: (1) SI (from Matsuda's composite index) = - 1.24 + 65/(I(b)G(b)I(m)G(m))(-0.5); (2) SI = 1.89 + 2690/(I(b)G(b)I(m)G(m)); (3) SI (from Bennett's index) = -2.93 + 5.16/(log I-b x log G(b)); (4) SI (from Sluiter's index) = 0.2 + 2400/(I(p)G(p)); (5) SI = -8.54 + 38.4/(Belfiore's ISI index); (6) SI (from Cederholm's formula) = 76/(G(m) log I-m); (7) SI = 0.248 + 0.947/G(b)I(m); (8) SI (from Mari's "oral glucose insulin sensitivity" index) = oral glucose insulin sensitivity/I-p; (9) Caumo's model. Glucose effectiveness Sg can also be accurately predicted by the following formula: Sg = 2.921e(60)(-0.185(G) (-) (G)())(b) (I-p = insulin peak; G(p) = glucose peak; I-a = insulin area; G(a) = glucose area; G(60) = glycemia at 60 minutes). The hyperglucidic SBT can provide accurate evaluations of SI and Sg, either by elaborated models or by simple empiric formulas. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 690
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MEASUREMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY BY THE MINIMAL MODEL METHOD USING A SIMPLIFIED INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST - VALIDITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY
    DUYSINX, BC
    SCHEEN, AJ
    GERARD, PL
    LETIEXHE, MR
    PAQUOT, N
    LEFEBVRE, PJ
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 1994, 20 (04): : 425 - 432
  • [22] Glucose metabolism in severe malaria: Minimal model analysis of the intravenous glucose tolerance test incorporating a stable glucose label
    Binh, TQ
    Davis, TME
    Johnston, W
    Thu, LTA
    Boston, R
    Danh, PT
    Anh, TK
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1997, 46 (12): : 1435 - 1440
  • [23] INSULIN SENSITIVITY, INSULIN-SECRETION, AND GLUCOSE EFFECTIVENESS IN SUBJECTS WITH IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE - A MINIMAL MODEL ANALYSIS
    TANIGUCHI, A
    NAKAI, Y
    FUKUSHIMA, M
    IMURA, H
    KAWAMURA, H
    NAGATA, I
    FLORANT, GL
    TOKUYAMA, K
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1994, 43 (06): : 714 - 718
  • [24] SIMPLE MEASUREMENTS AND FORMULAS FROM ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST PROVIDE ACCURATE EVALUATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY, SECRETION AND DISPOSITION INDEX SIMILAR TO THE MORE ELABORATED MODELS: COMPARISON WITH THE MINIMAL MODEL ANALYSIS OF AN INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST IN AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN
    Manickam, B.
    Akbar, A.
    Barengolts, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (04) : 769 - 769
  • [25] Novel Insulin Modified Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Improves the Estimation of Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Effectiveness
    Stefanovski, Darko
    Piccinini, Francesca
    Ader, Marilyn
    Kabir, Morvarid
    Bergman, Richard N.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [26] Characterization of the intravenous glucose tolerance test and the combined glucose-insulin test in donkeys
    Mendoza, F. J.
    Aguilera-Aguilera, R.
    Gonzalez-De Cara, C. A.
    Toribio, R. E.
    Estepa, J. C.
    Perez-Ecija, A.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 206 (03): : 371 - 376
  • [27] Hyaluronidase treatment of the glycocalyx attenuates insulin sensitivity during an intravenous glucose tolerance test in rats
    Eskens, Bart
    Cobelens, Hanneke
    Vink, Hans
    VanTeeffelen, Jurgen
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23
  • [28] Advantages of the single delay model for the assessment of insulin sensitivity from the intravenous glucose tolerance test
    Panunzi, Simona
    De Gaetano, Andrea
    Mingrone, Geltrude
    [J]. THEORETICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICAL MODELLING, 2010, 7
  • [29] Multiscale modelling of insulin secretion during an intravenous glucose tolerance test
    Pedersen, Morten Gram
    Cobelli, Claudio
    [J]. INTERFACE FOCUS, 2013, 3 (02)
  • [30] INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST TO ASSESS INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND SECRETION IN ACTIVE ACROMEGALY
    Niculescu, Dan Alexandru
    Dusceac, Roxana
    Caragheorgheopol, Andra
    Popescu, Nicoleta
    Poiana, Catalina
    [J]. INTERDIAB 2016: DIABETES MELLITUS AS CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2016, : 321 - 328