Advanced closed-loop communication training: the blindfolded resuscitation

被引:2
|
作者
Hughes, Kate E. [1 ]
Hughes, Patrick G. [2 ]
Cahir, Thomas [3 ]
Plitt, Jennifer [1 ]
Ng, Vivienne [1 ]
Bedrick, Edward [4 ]
Ahmed, Rami A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Emergency Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Charles E Schmidt Coll Med, Emergency Med, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Arizona Hlth Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Epidemiol & Biostat, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Emergency Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
关键词
simulation; communication skills; emergency medicine; assessment of crisis management skills; PATIENT-CARE; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; CRISIS; SKILLS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000498
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Closed-loop communication (CLC) improves task efficiency and decreases medical errors; however, limited literature on strategies to improve real-time use exist. The primary objective was whether blindfolding a resuscitation leader was effective to improve crisis resource management (CRM) skills, as measured by increased frequency of CLC. Secondary objectives included whether blindfolding affected overall CRM performance or perceived task load. Participants included emergency medicine (EM) or EM/paediatric dual resident physicians. Participants completed presurveys, were block randomised into intervention (blindfolded) or control groups, lead both adult and paediatric resuscitations and completed postsurveys before debriefing. Video recordings of the simulations were reviewed by simulation fellowship-trained EM physicians and rated using the Ottawa CRM Global Rating Scale (GRS). Frequency of CLC was assessed by one rater via video review. Summary statistics were performed. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Data were analysed using R program for analysis of variance and regression analysis. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in any Ottawa CRM GRS category. Postgraduate year (PGY) significantly impacts all Ottawa GRS categories. Frequency of CLC use significantly increased in the blindfolded group (31.7, 95% CI 29.34 to 34.1) vs the non-blindfolded group (24.6, 95% CI 21.5 to 27.7). Participant's self-rated perceived NASA Task Load Index scores demonstrated no difference between intervention and control groups via a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Blindfolding the resuscitation leader significantly increases frequency of CLC. The blindfold code training exercise is an advanced technique that may increase the use of CLC.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 238
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Closed-Loop Communication Improves Task Completion in Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation
    Abd El-Shafy, Ibrahim
    Delgado, Jennifer
    Akerman, Meredith
    Bullaro, Francesca
    Christopherson, Nathan A. M.
    Prince, Jose M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 75 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [2] Closed-loop resuscitation of burn shock
    Hoskins, SL
    Elgjo, GI
    Lu, JL
    Ying, H
    Grady, JJ
    Herndon, DN
    Kramer, GC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2006, 27 (03): : 377 - 385
  • [3] Adaptive closed-loop resuscitation controllers for hemorrhagic shock resuscitation
    Vega, Saul J.
    Berard, David
    Avital, Guy
    Ross, Evan
    Snider, Eric J.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2023, 63 : S230 - S240
  • [4] Closed-loop resuscitation of severe hemorrhagic shock
    Deyo, DJ
    Kramer, GC
    Kirschner, RA
    Elgjo, GI
    Prough, DS
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A13 - A13
  • [5] Closed-Loop Training for Projected GAN
    Zhao, Jiangwei
    Zhang, Liang
    Pan, Lili
    Li, Hongliang
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2024, 31 : 106 - 110
  • [6] Communication in interdisciplinary teams: exploring closed-loop communication during in situ trauma team training
    Hargestam, Maria
    Lindkvist, Marie
    Brulin, Christine
    Jacobsson, Maritha
    Hultin, Magnus
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (10):
  • [7] Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
    Ranganatha Sitaram
    Tomas Ros
    Luke Stoeckel
    Sven Haller
    Frank Scharnowski
    Jarrod Lewis-Peacock
    Nikolaus Weiskopf
    Maria Laura Blefari
    Mohit Rana
    Ethan Oblak
    Niels Birbaumer
    James Sulzer
    [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2017, 18 : 86 - 100
  • [8] Training and Support for Hybrid Closed-Loop Therapy
    Boughton, Charlotte K.
    Hartnell, Sara
    Allen, Janet M.
    Fuchs, Julia
    Hovorka, Roman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (01): : 218 - 223
  • [9] Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    Ros, Tomas
    Stoeckel, Luke
    Haller, Sven
    Scharnowski, Frank
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod
    Weiskopf, Nikolaus
    Blefari, Maria Laura
    Rana, Mohit
    Oblak, Ethan
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Sulzer, James
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 18 (02) : 86 - 100
  • [10] Rethinking Closed-Loop Training for Autonomous Driving
    Zhang, Chris
    Guo, Runsheng
    Zeng, Wenyuan
    Xiong, Yuwen
    Dai, Binbin
    Hu, Rui
    Ren, Mengye
    Urtasun, Raquel
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION, ECCV 2022, PT XXXIX, 2022, 13699 : 264 - 282