Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback

被引:0
|
作者
Ranganatha Sitaram
Tomas Ros
Luke Stoeckel
Sven Haller
Frank Scharnowski
Jarrod Lewis-Peacock
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Maria Laura Blefari
Mohit Rana
Ethan Oblak
Niels Birbaumer
James Sulzer
机构
[1] Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering,Department of Psychiatry
[2] and Section of Neuroscience,Department of Psychology
[3] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,Department of Neurophysics
[4] Neurology and Imaging of Cognition Lab,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[5] University of Geneva,undefined
[6] National Institute of Diabetes,undefined
[7] Digestive and Kidney Diseases,undefined
[8] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[9] Affidea Centre Diagnostique Radiologique de Carouge CDRC,undefined
[10] Psychiatric University Hospital,undefined
[11] University of Zürich,undefined
[12] Imaging Research Center,undefined
[13] University of Texas at Austin,undefined
[14] Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences,undefined
[15] Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging,undefined
[16] Institute of Neurology,undefined
[17] University College London,undefined
[18] Defitech Chair in Brain-Machine Interface,undefined
[19] Center for Neuroprosthetics,undefined
[20] École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,undefined
[21] University of Texas at Austin,undefined
[22] Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengeneering,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neurofeedback is a type of biofeedback in which neural activity is measured and presented through one or more sensory channels to the participant in real time to facilitate self-regulation of the putative neural substrates that underlie a particular behaviour or pathologyAnimal and human brain self-regulation has been demonstrated using various invasive and non-invasive recording methods and with different features of the brain signals, such as frequency spectra, functional connectivity or spatiotemporal patterns of brain activityNeurofeedback provides the possibility of endogenously manipulating brain activity as an independent variable, making it a powerful neuroscientific toolNeurofeedback training results in specific neural changes relevant to the trained brain circuit and the associated behavioural changes. These changes have been shown to last anywhere from hours to months after training and to correlate with changes in grey and white matter structureThe underlying neural circuitry relating to the process of brain self-regulation is becoming clearer. Accumulating evidence suggests the involvement of the thalamus and the dorsolateral prefrontal, posterior parietal and occipital cortices in neurofeedback control, and the dorsal and ventral striatum, anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula in neurofeedback reward processingPsychological factors, such as the differential influence of feedback, reward and experimental instructions, and other factors, such as sense of agency and locus of control, are now being investigated for their effects on neurofeedbackThe demonstration of robust clinical effects remains a major hurdle in neurofeedback research. The results of randomized controlled trials in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and stroke rehabilitation have been mixed, and have been affected by differences in study design, difficulty of identifying responders and the scarcity of homogenous patient populationsFuture neurofeedback research will probably clarify the psychological and neural mechanisms that may help to address issues in clinical translation
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    Ros, Tomas
    Stoeckel, Luke
    Haller, Sven
    Scharnowski, Frank
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod
    Weiskopf, Nikolaus
    Blefari, Maria Laura
    Rana, Mohit
    Oblak, Ethan
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Sulzer, James
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 18 (02) : 86 - 100
  • [2] Author Correction: Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
    Ranganatha Sitaram
    Tomas Ros
    Luke Stoeckel
    Sven Haller
    Frank Scharnowski
    Jarrod Lewis-Peacock
    Nikolaus Weiskopf
    Maria Laura Blefari
    Mohit Rana
    Ethan Oblak
    Niels Birbaumer
    James Sulzer
    [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2019, 20 : 314 - 314
  • [3] Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback (vol 18, pg 86, 2017)
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    Ros, Tomas
    Stoeckel, Luke
    Haller, Sven
    Scharnowski, Frank
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod
    Weiskopf, Nikolaus
    Blefari, Maria Laura
    Rana, Mohit
    Oblak, Ethan
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Sulzer, James
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 20 (05) : 314 - 314
  • [4] Modulation of critical brain dynamics using closed-loop neurofeedback stimulation
    Zhigalov, Alexander
    Kaplan, Alexander
    Palva, J. Matias
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (08) : 2882 - 2889
  • [5] Training the Brain-Methodological Progress and Clinical Translation of Real-Time Neurofeedback Closed-Loop Modulation
    Becker, Benjamin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 168 : S81 - S81
  • [6] EEG-Based Closed-Loop Neurofeedback for Attention Monitoring and Training in Young Adults
    Wang, Bingbing
    Xu, Zeju
    Luo, Tong
    Pan, Jiahui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021 : 5535810
  • [7] EEG-Based Closed-Loop Neurofeedback for Attention Monitoring and Training in Young Adults
    Wang, Bingbing
    Xu, Zeju
    Luo, Tong
    Pan, Jiahui
    [J]. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, 2021
  • [8] Closed-Loop Frontal Midlineθ Neurofeedback: A Novel Approach for Training Focused-Attention Meditation
    Brandmeyer, Tracy
    Delorme, Arnaud
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [9] Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation
    Zrenner, Christoph
    Ziemann, Ulf
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 95 (06) : 545 - 552
  • [10] Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging
    Debettencourt, Megan T.
    Cohen, Jonathan D.
    Lee, Ray F.
    Norman, Kenneth A.
    Turk-Browne, Nicholas B.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 18 (03) : 470 - 165