Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment

被引:140
|
作者
Liu, Hu-Chen [1 ]
Fan, Xiao-Jun [1 ]
Li, Ping [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Yi-Zeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] Zhoupu Hosp, Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201318, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, East Hosp, Shanghai 200120, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk evaluation; Fuzzy logic; MULTIMOORA; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MOORA METHOD; PROJECT; OPTIMIZATION; SELECTION; RANKING; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2014.04.011
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a prospective risk assessment tool which has been widely used within various industries, particularly the aerospace, automotive and healthcare industries. However, the conventional risk priority number (RPN) method has been criticized much for its deficiencies in risk factor weights, computation of RPN, evaluation of failure modes and so on. Therefore ranking of failure modes based on their related risk factors is necessary seeking to overcome the shortcomings and enhance the assessment capability of the traditional FMEA. In this paper, we treat the risk factors and their weights as fuzzy variables and evaluate them using fuzzy linguistic terms. As a result, a new risk priority model is proposed for evaluating the risk of failure modes based on fuzzy set theory and MULTIMOORA method. An empirical case of preventing infant abduction is provided to illustrate the potential applications and benefits of the proposed fuzzy FMEA. The main findings of this article are related with the proposed technique for failure modes assessment and ranking, and application of this technique for the prevention of infant abduction, which is a devastating problem for a healthcare facility. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 177
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk Assessment in ERP Project by COPRAS Method Under Fuzzy Environment
    Nigam, Mukesh Kumar
    Avikal, Shwetank
    Ram, Mangey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIABILITY QUALITY AND SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2021, 28 (06)
  • [32] An integrated model for evaluating the risk factors of crypto-currencies under fuzzy environment
    Bulut, Merve
    Uyar, Mehmet Erkin
    Ozcan, Evrencan
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 134
  • [33] An Extended QUALIFLEX Method Under Probability Hesitant Fuzzy Environment for Selecting Green Suppliers
    Li, Jian
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (06) : 1866 - 1879
  • [34] An extended TODIM method to rank products with online reviews under intuitionistic fuzzy environment
    Zhang, Dong
    Li, Yongli
    Wu, Chong
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (02) : 322 - 334
  • [35] An Extended QUALIFLEX Method Under Probability Hesitant Fuzzy Environment for Selecting Green Suppliers
    Jian Li
    Jian-qiang Wang
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 19 : 1866 - 1879
  • [36] A new integrated MCDM approach for improving QFD based on DEMATEL and extended MULTIMOORA under uncertainty environment
    Chen, Yifan
    Ran, Yan
    Huang, Guangquan
    Xiao, Liming
    Zhang, Genbao
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 105
  • [37] Fuzzy Risk Prioritization of the Failure Modes in Rolling Stocks
    Ghodrati, B.
    Rahimdel, M. J.
    Vahed, A. Taghizadeh
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2018, : 108 - 112
  • [38] MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment
    Lin, Mingwei
    Huang, Chao
    Xu, Zeshui
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 53
  • [39] A dynamic model for PERT risk evaluating in fuzzy environment
    Mehrabadi, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE-JMCS, 2011, 3 (01): : 35 - 52
  • [40] A fuzzy method for measuring efficiency under fuzzy environment
    Lee, HS
    Shen, PD
    Chyr, WL
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3682 : 343 - 349