A systematic review of the interaction and effects generated by antimicrobial metallic substituents in bone tissue engineering

被引:11
|
作者
Chetan [1 ]
Vijayalakshmi, Uthirapathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Dept Chem, Sch Adv Sci, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; ZINC-OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; MARROW STROMAL CELLS; ANTIBACTERIAL STAINLESS-STEEL; VITRO BIOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS; MULTIDRUG EFFLUX PUMPS; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.1039/d0mt00127a
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Metallic elements are one of the key components of human physiology, which are required for basic cellular and extracellular functions. Herein, we provide insight into the bioactive metallic dopants silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg) and ceria (Ce), which provide resistance against human pathogenic bacteria, and summarise the pathways for their generated effects crucial for osteogenic activity in an antibacterial environment and bone regeneration. Although most of these elements interact with genetic material, resulting in denaturation to produce apoptosis of pathogenic cells, some create adverse effects in the cellular matrix, which interfere with normal cellular metabolism and inhibit cellular activity, reducing the further growth and formation of bacterial colonies. Furthermore, although remarkable antibacterial activity has been recorded, bacterial cells have developed pathways and transporter proteins that remove the excess of these antibacterial elements from the cellular matrix. Thus, a discussion of these reported pathways as limitations is presented to find more novel modes of administration of these elements since they show good biocompatibility and are non-cytotoxic at certain release concentrations. As a cofactor of several enzymes, it is worth noting that some of these elements not only help in the metabolism of bone, but also activate the genetic pathways that regulate the formation of and maintain the factors that support new bone. The choice of incorporating these materials in ionic or nanoparticle form depends on the target substrate since they exhibit different mechanisms of action and even produce selective effects depending on their physical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1479
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fabrication of magnesium-based metallic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Malladi, Lipi
    Mahapatro, Anil
    Gomes, Anosh Steffin
    MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 33 (02) : 173 - 182
  • [32] Could we use metallic wood for bone tissue engineering applications?
    Beheshtizadeh, Nima
    Zarei, Masoud
    Azami, Mahmoud
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 17
  • [34] Nanolayers on Magnesium (Mg) Alloy for Metallic Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
    Mahapatro, Anil
    Negron, Taina D. Matos
    Bonner, Carl
    Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2013, 3 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [35] Antimicrobial Biomaterials for the Healing of Infected Bone Tissue: A Systematic Review of Microtomographic Data on Experimental Animal Models
    Mariano, Lorena Castro
    Fernandes, Maria Helena Raposo
    Gomes, Pedro Sousa
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [36] A systematic review of autologous bone grafting versus artificial bone substituents for the management of enchondroma in the hand
    Anton I. Alvaro
    Timothy R. Chew
    Nicholas W. Smith
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 48 (1)
  • [37] Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review in Bone Biomimetics and Drug Delivery Strategies
    Porter, Joshua R.
    Ruckh, Timothy T.
    Popat, Ketul C.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2009, 25 (06) : 1539 - 1560
  • [38] COMMON SCAFFOLDS IN TISSUE ENGINEERING FOR BONE TISSUE REGENERATION: A REVIEW ARTICLE
    Hozan, Calin Tudor
    Cote, Adrian
    Bulzan, Madalin
    Szilagyi, Gheorghe
    PHARMACOPHORE, 2023, 14 (06): : 46 - 51
  • [39] Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage tissue engineering: a review
    Nafiseh Olov
    Shadab Bagheri-Khoulenjani
    Hamid Mirzadeh
    Progress in Biomaterials, 2022, 11 : 113 - 135
  • [40] Natural Biopolymers for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Brief Review
    Pramanik S.
    Kharche S.
    More N.
    Ranglani D.
    Singh G.
    Kapusetti G.
    Engineered Regeneration, 2023, 4 (02): : 193 - 204