The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME)

被引:67
|
作者
Tobian, Aaron A. R. [1 ]
Fuller, Alice K. [1 ]
Uglik, Kristin [1 ]
Tisch, Daniel J. [2 ]
Borge, Prabhakar D. [3 ]
Benjamin, Richard J. [3 ]
Ness, Paul M. [1 ]
King, Karen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Amer Red Cross, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTI-IGA; PLASMA; PREMEDICATION; DIPHENHYDRAMINE; ACETAMINOPHEN; ANTIBODIES; STORAGE; COMPONENTS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1111/trf.12498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Allergic transfusion reaction (ATR) incidence ranges from 1% to 3% of all transfusions. We evaluated the impact of InterSol platelet additive solution (PAS) apheresis platelets (APs) on the incidence of ATRs and the posttransfusion platelet (PLT) increment. Study Design and Methods This retrospective study evaluated all ATRs among patients at a university hospital that maintained a mixed inventory of PAS APs and non-PAS APs (standard plasma-suspended PLTs). Corrected count increments (CCIs) were calculated for AP transfusions of individuals who received both a PAS and a non-PAS AP transfusion within a 7-day period. Hypothesis testing was performed with chi-square test for dichotomous variables and t tests for continuous variables. Results The incidence of ATRs among the non-PAS APs was 1.85% (72 ATRs/3884 transfusions) and 1.01% (12 ATRs/1194 transfusions) for PAS APs (risk ratio [RR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.30-0.99; p=0.04). However, there was no difference in the incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions between non-PAS APs (incidence, 0.70%; 27/3884) compared to PAS APs (incidence, 0.59%; 7/1194; p=0.69). Among 223 individuals with paired non-PAS and PAS AP transfusions, the mean CCI at 1 to 4 hours after transfusion was 4932 (95% CI, 4452-5412) for non-PAS APs and was lower for PAS APs (CCI, 3766; 95% CI, 3375-4158; p0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean CCI at 12 to 24 hours between non-PAS (CCI, 2135; 95% CI, 1696-2573) and PAS APs (CCI, 1745; 95% CI, 1272-2217; p=0.14). Conclusions PAS APs substantially reduce the number of ATRs. CCIs for PAS APs were lower immediately after transfusion, but not significantly different at 12 to 24 hours.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1523 / 1529
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploratory studies of extended storage of apheresis platelets in a platelet additive solution (PAS)
    Slichter, Sherrill J.
    Corson, Jill
    Jones, Mary Kay
    Christoffel, Todd
    Pellham, Esther
    Bailey, S. Lawrence
    Bolgiano, Doug
    BLOOD, 2014, 123 (02) : 271 - 280
  • [22] Allergic transfusion reactions to platelets are more commonly associated with prepooled than apheresis components
    Xiao, W.
    Tormey, C. A.
    Capetillo, A.
    Maitta, R. W.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2013, 105 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [23] A positive effect of immune suppression on corrected count increment after platelet transfusion at 1 but not at 24 h
    Dijkstra-Tiekstra, M. J.
    Rondeel, J. M. M.
    Slomp, J.
    Smid, W. M.
    de Wildt-Eggen, J.
    TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2013, 49 (02) : 189 - 192
  • [24] Predictors of the corrected count increment after platelet transfusion, a secondary analysis of the PACER randomized controlled trial
    van Baarle, Floor L. F.
    van de Weerdt, Emma K.
    van der Velden, Walter J. F. M.
    Ruiterkamp, Roelof A.
    Tuinman, Pieter R.
    Ypma, Paula F.
    van den Bergh, Walter M.
    Demandt, Astrid M. P.
    Kerver, Emile D.
    Jansen, A. J. Gerard
    Westerweel, Peter E.
    Arbous, M. Sesmu
    Determann, Rogier M.
    van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
    Koeman, Mirelle
    Makelburg, Anja B. U.
    van Lienden, Krijn P.
    Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
    Biemond, Bart J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 98 (11) : E305 - E308
  • [25] In vitro and in vivo quality of leukoreduced apheresis platelets stored in a new platelet additive solution
    Dumont, Larry J.
    Cancelas, Jose A.
    Graminske, Sharon
    Friedman, Kenneth D.
    Vassallo, Ralph R.
    Whitley, Pamela H.
    Rugg, Neeta
    Dumont, Deborah F.
    Herschel, Louise
    Siegal, Alan H.
    Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M.
    Fender, Logan
    Razatos, Anna
    TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 (05) : 972 - 980
  • [26] Effects of immediate or delayed addition of platelet additive solution on the in vitro quality of apheresis platelets
    Ringwald, Juergen
    Tully, Susanne
    Geier, Christoph
    Hauck, Barbara
    Weiss, Dominik
    Callaert, Martine
    Eckstein, Reinhold
    TRANSFUSION, 2012, 52 (06) : 1237 - 1244
  • [27] Comparison of abo antibody levels in apheresis platelets suspended in platelet additive solution and plasma
    Gayathiri, K. C.
    Murugesan, Mohandoss
    Nayanar, Sangeetha K.
    Malodan, Riyas
    Padmanaban, Maya
    HEMATOLOGY TRANSFUSION AND CELL THERAPY, 2021, 43 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [28] Comparison of platelet transfusion as fresh whole blood versus apheresis platelets for massively transfused combat trauma patients (CME)
    Perkins, Jeremy G.
    Cap, Andrew P.
    Spinella, Philip C.
    Shorr, Andrew F.
    Beekley, Alec C.
    Grathwohl, Kurt W.
    Rentas, Francisco J.
    Wade, Charles E.
    Holcomb, John B.
    TRANSFUSION, 2011, 51 (02) : 242 - 252
  • [29] Apheresis Platelets Stored in a New Platelet Additive Solution for 5 Days Are Comparable to Plasma Stored Platelets In Vitro
    Razatos, A.
    Wittevrongel, L.
    Fender, L.
    Cancelas, J. A.
    Rugg, N.
    Friedman, K. D.
    Graminske, S.
    Vassallo, R. R.
    Whitley, P. H.
    TRANSFUSION, 2010, 50 : 43A - 44A
  • [30] Specificity of the Pan Genera Detection Test in Prestorage Pooled Platelets and Apheresis Platelets Suspended in Platelet Additive Solution
    Zantek, N. D.
    Cohn, C. S.
    Foster, A.
    Good, C. E.
    Pulkrabek, S.
    Jacobs, M. R.
    TRANSFUSION, 2015, 55 : 188A - 188A