Geophysical inversion for 3D contact surface geometry

被引:0
|
作者
Galley, Christopher G. [1 ]
Lelievre, Peter G. [2 ]
Farquharson, Colin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Earth Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X7, Canada
[2] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Sackville, NB E4L 1E4, Canada
关键词
TRIANGLE INTERSECTION TEST; SEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME; JOINT INVERSION; GRAVITY-DATA; FINITE-ELEMENT; MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA; CONSTRAINED INVERSION; HYBRID OPTIMIZATION; MAGNETIC DATA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0614.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Geologists' interpretations about the earth typically involve distinct rock units with contacts between them. Three-dimensional geologic models typically comprise surfaces of tessellated polygons that represent the contacts. In contrast, geophysical inversions typically are performed on voxel meshes comprising space-filling elements. Standard minimum-structure voxel inversions recover smooth models, inconsistent with typical geologic interpretations. Various voxel inversion methods have been developed that attempt to produce models more consistent with such interpretations. However, many of those methods involve increased numerical challenges and ultimately the underlying parameterization of the earth is still inconsistent with geologists' interpretations. Surface geometry inversion (SGI) is a fundamentally different approach that effectively takes some initial surface-based model and alters the position of the contact surfaces to better fit the geophysical data. Many authors have developed SGI methods. In contrast to those, we are the first to develop a method with the following characteristics: we work directly with 3D explicit surfaces from an input geologic model of arbitrary complexity; we incorporate intersection detection methods to avoid unacceptable topological scenarios; we use global optimization strategies and stochastic sampling to solve the inverse problem and aid model assessment; and we use surface subdivision to reduce the number of model parameters, which also provides regularization without adding the complication of trade-off parameters in the objective function. We test our methods on simpler synthetic examples taken from early influential literature, and we demonstrate their typical use on a more complicated example based on a seafloor massive sulfide deposit. Our work provides a geophysical inversion approach that can work directly with 3D surface-based geologic models. With this approach, geophysical and geologic models can share the same parameterization; there is only a single model, with no need to translate information between two inconsistent parameterizations.
引用
收藏
页码:K27 / K45
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D surface MRS method based on variable geometry inversion
    Zhao, Yue
    Lin, Jun
    Jiang, Chuandong
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2017, : 345 - 349
  • [2] Grasp Stability Analysis of Multiple Objects including Contact Surface Geometry in 3D
    Yamada, Takayoshi
    Yamamoto, Hidehiko
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (ICMA), 2013, : 36 - 43
  • [3] Geometry of ophiolites in eastern Cuba from 3D inversion of aeromagnetic data, constrained by surface geology
    Batista-Rodriguez, Jose A.
    Perez-Flores, Marco A.
    Quiroga-Goode, Gerardo
    Gallardo, Luis A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (03) : B81 - B91
  • [4] Inversion of geophysical measurements for fracture geometry
    Brown, SR
    Smith, ML
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 799 - 805
  • [5] 3D Monte Carlo geometry inversion using gravity data
    Wei, Xiaolong
    Sun, Jiajia
    Sen, Mrinal
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 89 (03) : G29 - G44
  • [6] Efficient gravity data inversion for 3D topography of a contact surface with application to the Hellenic subduction zone
    Prutkin, I.
    Casten, U.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2009, 35 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [7] The rebuilding 3D of the contact surface of electrical apparatus
    Liu, JM
    Sun, H
    Cui, YL
    [J]. 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 2045 - 2048
  • [8] SAR TOMOGRAPHY OF URBAN AREAS: 3D REGULARIZED INVERSION IN THE SCENE GEOMETRY
    Rambour, Clement
    Denis, Loic
    Tupin, Florence
    Nicolas, Jean-Marie
    Oriot, Helene
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 6095 - 6098
  • [9] 3D geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data to test the 3D geologic model of the Bradys geothermal area, Nevada, USA
    Jeffrey B. Witter
    Drew L. Siler
    James E. Faulds
    Nicholas H. Hinz
    [J]. Geothermal Energy, 4
  • [10] 3D geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data to test the 3D geologic model of the Bradys geothermal area, Nevada, USA
    Witter, Jeffrey B.
    Siler, Drew L.
    Faulds, James E.
    Hinz, Nicholas H.
    [J]. GEOTHERMAL ENERGY, 2016, 4 (01):