3D geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data to test the 3D geologic model of the Bradys geothermal area, Nevada, USA

被引:0
|
作者
Jeffrey B. Witter
Drew L. Siler
James E. Faulds
Nicholas H. Hinz
机构
[1] Mira Geoscience Ltd.,Energy Geosciences Division
[2] Innovate Geothermal Ltd.,Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology
[3] Lawrence Berkeley National Lab,undefined
[4] University of Nevada,undefined
[5] Reno,undefined
来源
关键词
Geothermal exploration; Conceptual models; 3D geophysical inversion modeling; Gravity data; Bradys geothermal system; GOCAD; VPmg;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Three-dimensional geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data has been performed to test the validity of a 3D geologic model constructed for the Bradys geothermal area. Geophysical modeling was implemented in three different ways: (1) fully unconstrained (i.e., no geologic data included); (2) constrained by the 3D geologic model using homogeneous rock unit densities, and (3) constrained by the 3D geologic model using heterogeneous rock unit densities. We show that the existing 3D geologic model of the Bradys area is broadly consistent with the gravity data. At a more detailed level, however, our analysis suggests that some adjustments to the Bradys 3D geologic model would improve agreement between the observed gravity and the calculated gravity response. The results of the geophysical inversion modeling are important as they serve as a guide to show where and how the boundaries of the 3D geologic model may need to be adjusted to address density excesses and deficiencies. A 3D geologic model that has been independently tested prior to drilling (using a method such as that described in this paper) will be more robust and have less uncertainty than those which have not been tested. Such an approach will facilitate a reduction in drilling risk, lead to more successful drilling programs, and provide valuable geologic input to improve the accuracy of reservoir models.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data to test the 3D geologic model of the Bradys geothermal area, Nevada, USA
    Witter, Jeffrey B.
    Siler, Drew L.
    Faulds, James E.
    Hinz, Nicholas H.
    [J]. GEOTHERMAL ENERGY, 2016, 4 (01):
  • [2] 3D Inversion of Gravity Data for Obama Geothermal Field.
    Orouji, B.
    Toushmalani, Reza
    Abbasabadi, Leila
    [J]. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (06): : 1249 - 1253
  • [3] The Intergrated Delineation of Geothermal System Area 'Z' Using 3D Inversion of Magnetotelluric Data and Gravity Data
    Wahyu, S.
    Daud, Y.
    Rahadinata, T.
    Fahmi, F.
    Hafidz, M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2017 (ISCPMS2017), 2018, 2023
  • [4] 3D Joint inversion of gravity and gravity tensor data
    ZHAO Simin
    GAO Xiuhe
    QIAO Zhongkun
    JIANG Dandan
    ZHOU Fei
    LIN Song
    [J]. Global Geology, 2018, 21 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [5] Integrated 3D inversion of magnetotelluric and HeliTEM data collected in the geothermal area of Japan
    Gribenko, Alexander
    Cox, Leif
    Jorgensen, Michael
    Zhdanov, Michael S.
    Ikeya, Masami
    Usui, Yusuke
    [J]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2022, 2022-August : 682 - 686
  • [6] Constraints in 3D gravity inversion
    Boulanger, O
    Chouteau, M
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2001, 49 (02) : 265 - 280
  • [7] 3D inversion of borehole gravity data using cokriging
    GENG Meixia
    HUANG Danian
    XU Bowen
    [J]. Global Geology, 2014, 17 (04) : 225 - 230
  • [8] 3D stochastic joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data
    Shamsipour, Pejman
    Marcotte, Denis
    Chouteau, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 79 : 27 - 37
  • [9] Deep Learning 3D Sparse Inversion of Gravity Data
    Huang, Rui
    Liu, Shuang
    Qi, Rui
    Zhang, Yujie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2021, 126 (11)
  • [10] 3D fast inversion of gravity data based on GPU
    WANG Xusheng
    ZENG Zhaofa
    [J]. Global Geology, 2018, 21 (02) : 114 - 119