The management and communication of a food risk controversy: the Swedish campylobacter case

被引:5
|
作者
Lofstedt, Ragnar [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, Kings Ctr Risk Management, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Risk communication; campylobacter; Sweden; food; VIEWS; SPP; ENTERITIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2019.1608287
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Between September 2016 and May 2017 levels of campylobacter infections in Swedish conventionally reared broilers doubled to more than 20%. The increased levels of infected broilers in turn led to a massive increase in Swedes getting sick from campylobacter food poisoning. In April 2017, for example, the Swedish medical community reported that there were five times higher levels of Swedish campylobacter poisonings compared to a normal year and a vast majority of these were from domestic rather than foreign sources. This paper evaluates how the risks of campylobacter food poisoning were communicated by a number of different actors involved with the scare and is based on a content analysis of 10 of Sweden's main newspapers in the period June 2016-September 2017 and 12 elite interviews with some of these individuals. In conclusion, I suggest a number a policy recommendations that the Swedish Agricultural Board and the Swedish Food Agency may want to implement going forward.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 816
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk communication and fatty fish: the case of the Swedish Food Agency
    Lofstedt, Ragnar
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2019, 22 (06) : 749 - 757
  • [2] Risk factors for indigenous campylobacter infection: a Swedish case-control study
    Studahl, A
    Andersson, Y
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2000, 125 (02): : 269 - 275
  • [3] RISK COMMUNICATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ENSURING FOOD SAFETY - CASE OF E. COLI OUTBREAK
    Micovic, Elizabeta
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND SECURITY - CONTEMPORARY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2013, : 547 - 561
  • [4] Risk communication and the FSA: the food colourings case
    Lofstedt, Ragnar
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (05) : 537 - 557
  • [5] Consumer responses to communication about food risk management
    van Dijk, Heleen
    Houghton, Julie
    van Kleef, Ellen
    van der Lans, Ivo
    Rowe, Gene
    Frewer, Lynn
    APPETITE, 2008, 50 (2-3) : 340 - 352
  • [6] Soft modelling in risk communication and management: examples in handling food risk
    French, S
    Maule, AJ
    Mythen, G
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (08) : 879 - 888
  • [7] WASTE INCINERATION - CONTROVERSY AND RISK COMMUNICATION
    GRAY, PCR
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 1995, 45 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [8] RISK COMMUNICATION IN THE SWEDISH ENERGY SECTOR
    LOFSTEDT, RE
    ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (07) : 768 - 772
  • [9] Risk Analysis for System of Systems Management: The Swedish COVID-19 Management Case
    Pettersson, Marjorie Nawila
    Axelsson, Jakob
    Johansson, Anna
    Svenson, Pontus
    18TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, SYSCON 2024, 2024,
  • [10] Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy - a Swedish Case study
    Eriksson, Mattias
    Strid, Ingrid
    Hansson, Per-Anders
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 93 : 115 - 125