Quality appraisal of educational websites about osteoporosis and bone health

被引:1
|
作者
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A. [1 ]
des Bordes, Jude K. A. [2 ]
Syed, Maha N. [3 ]
Alemam, Ahmed [4 ]
Dodeja, Abhinav [5 ]
Abdel-Wahab, Noha [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Suarez-Almazor, Maria E. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Family & Community Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gen Internal Med, Unit 437,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] BronxCare Hosp Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Div Hospitalist Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gen Internal Med, Sect Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Melanoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Assiut Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Rheumatol & Rehabil Dept, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Education; Patient; Quality reporting; Osteoporosis; Websites;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-021-00877-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose/introduction Bone health education publicly available through the Internet, if evidence-based and unbiased, could help patients deal with issues such as decision-making, maintaining healthy lifestyles, using medications correctly, and improving their communication with health professionals. Methods We performed an environmental scan and quality assessment of the currently available osteoporosis and bone health patient education information on the World Wide Web. The sample websites were identified by using three separate search tools: Google Advanced, Bing, and . Two independent investigators collected data and appraised the quality of selected websites. Results We identified 48 websites. Most websites were focused on risks factors of osteoporosis, preventive measures, screening recommendations, and topics to discuss with the physician. All websites provided adequate information describing treatment options; however, only 36% had information addressing duration of treatment, what happens when treatment stops, and the benefits and risks of various treatments. A total of 55% of the websites had their content updated to 2019 and 68% cited their sources of information to support their content. Reading levels ranged from 7.5 to 15.2 (higher than the recommended 6-grade level). Conclusions Websites with information about bone health and osteoporosis commonly present information about initial treatment choices, but most fail to address risk-benefit issues, and common barriers than can occur throughout the course of the disease. In addition, many websites did not update their content, did not cite their sources of information, or were written at a 9-grade level or above (rendering them unsuitable for low-literacy populations).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality appraisal of educational websites about osteoporosis and bone health
    Maria A. Lopez-Olivo
    Jude K. A. des Bordes
    Maha N. Syed
    Ahmed Alemam
    Abhinav Dodeja
    Noha Abdel-Wahab
    Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2021, 16
  • [2] Quality Appraisal of Educational Websites on Osteoporosis and Bone Health.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Abdel-Wahab, Noha
    Dodeja, Abhinav
    Pratt, Gregory
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 66 : S884 - S884
  • [3] Quality Assessment of Websites Providing Educational Content about Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Ojeda-Prias, Ana
    Heung, Eric
    Leong, Amye L.
    Willcockson, Irmgard
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 67
  • [4] Quality of health information about epilepsy on the Internet: Evaluation of French websites
    Auvin, S.
    Dupont, S.
    [J]. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2013, 169 (03) : 234 - 239
  • [5] BELIEFS ABOUT OSTEOPOROSIS - A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL
    MEULEMAN, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (04) : 762 - 765
  • [6] Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal
    Azharuddin, Md
    Adil, Mohammad
    Khan, Rashid Ali
    Ghosh, Pinaki
    Kapur, Prem
    Sharma, Manju
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS AND SARCOPENIA, 2020, 6 (02) : 39 - 52
  • [7] KNOWLEDGE ABOUT OSTEOPOROSIS AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
    Renier, Colleen M.
    Haller, Irina V.
    Palcher, Jeanette A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (09) : 2049 - 2049
  • [8] Emerging views about "osteoporosis", bone health, strength, fragility, and their determinants
    Frost, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2002, 20 (06) : 319 - 325
  • [9] Emerging views about “osteoporosis”, bone health, strength, fragility, and their determinants
    Harold M. Frost
    [J]. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2002, 20 : 319 - 325
  • [10] Osteoporosis and Bone Health
    Kaveh, Kamran
    Ibrahim, Rashid
    Emadi, Mozhdeh
    Abu Bakar, Mohd Zuki
    Ibrahim, Tengku Azmi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2010, 9 (06): : 1048 - 1054