Optimal sensor distance for damage detection considering wavelet sensitivity and uncertainties

被引:0
|
作者
Abdulkareem, Muyideen [1 ]
Kasali, Mujedu [2 ,3 ]
Martins, Esan [2 ,4 ]
Nathaniel, Olukotun [2 ,5 ]
Abd Majid, Muhd Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Construct Res Ctr, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
[3] Fed Polytech, Dept Civil Engn, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
[4] Fed Polytech, Dept Bldg Technol, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
[5] Kogi State Polytech, Dept Bldg Technol, Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria
关键词
IDENTIFICATION; TRANSFORM; BEAM;
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012018
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Wavelet Transform ( WT) is an efficient signal processing tool used extensively to detect damage in various types of structures. It is capable of describing signals in both time and frequency domains. However, improper sensor distance may result to false detection of damage, thus affecting the reliability of the method. A small sensor distance leads to large number of sensors, thus increases the financial cost and causes higher computational time, while large sensor distance may provide inadequate data for accurate damage detection. In this paper, the optimum sensor placement for damage detection is investigated by considering the effect of noise and sensitivity of WT. This involves using Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) to decompose the mode shape difference of a plate numerical model. Different measurement distances and different levels of uncertainties are added to the mode shape data to evaluate the optimum sensor distance that provide the best damage detection result. A numerical plate model with all four sides fixed is used as an example. The results indicate that increase of noise reduced the detectability of damage. It is also observed that excessive sensor distance increment significantly effects damage detectability.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal operational planning considering uncertainties for energy plants
    Kitagawa, S.
    Matsui, T.
    Kikuchi, K.
    Matsumoto, K.
    Fukuyama, Y.
    2009 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 4241 - 4246
  • [32] Structural damage detection considering sensor performance degradation and measurement noise effect
    Ma, Sheng-Lan
    Jiang, Shao-Fei
    Li, Jun
    MEASUREMENT, 2019, 131 : 431 - 442
  • [33] Statistical Pattern Recognition for Optimal Sensor Placement in Damage Detection Applications
    Liangou, Theodora
    Katsoudas, Anastasios
    Silionis, Nicholas
    Anyfantis, Konstantinos
    EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING (EWSHM 2022), VOL 2, 2023, : 217 - 226
  • [34] Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural damage detection
    Beck, JL
    Papadimitriou, C
    Au, SK
    Vanik, MW
    SMART SYSTEMS FOR BRIDGES, STRUCTURES, AND HIGHWAYS, 1998, 3325 : 161 - 172
  • [35] Optimal sensor placement for damage detection of bridges subject to ship collision
    Guo, Y. L.
    Ni, Y. Q.
    Chen, S. K.
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2017, 24 (09):
  • [36] Adaptive Detection of Sensor Uncertainties and Failures
    Burkholder, Jason O.
    Tao, Gang
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2011, 34 (06) : 1605 - 1612
  • [37] An investigation of optimal sensor locations for multi-type sensors considering modeling uncertainties by Bayesian system identification
    Adarsh, S.
    Ray-Chaudhuri, Samit
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2024, 577
  • [38] Investigation on Selection of Optimal Mother Wavelet in Mode Shape based Damage Detection Exercise
    Jaiswal, Naresh G.
    Pande, Deepak W.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING, INTER-ENG 2016, 2017, 181 : 531 - 537
  • [39] Structural damage identification based on dual sensitivity analysis from optimal sensor placement
    Qi, Tengrun
    Hou, Zhilong
    Yu, Ling
    Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 2024, 3 (03):
  • [40] Damage identification of offshore jacket platforms in a digital twin framework considering optimal sensor placement
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Incecik, Atilla
    Feng, Shizhe
    Gupta, M. K.
    Krolczyk, Grzegorz
    Li, Z.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 237