Effect of organization-level variables on differential employee participation in 10 federal worksite health promotion programs

被引:65
|
作者
Crump, CE
Earp, JAL
Kozma, CM
HertzPicciotto, I
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA, SCH PUBL HLTH, DEPT HLTH BEHAV & HLTH EDUC, CHAPEL HILL, NC USA
[2] UNIV S CAROLINA, COLL PHARM, COLUMBIA, SC 29208 USA
[3] UNIV N CAROLINA, SCH PUBL HLTH, DEPT EPIDEMIOL, CHAPEL HILL, NC USA
来源
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY | 1996年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109019819602300206
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Guided by a conceptual model, the authors used both qualitative data (e.g., individual interviews, focus groups) and quantitative data from an employee survey (N = 3,388) in 10 federal agencies to investigate whether organization context and implementation process affected participation in worksite health promotion and disease prevention (HPDP) activities among demographic subgroups. Overall, employees on average participated in fewer than two agency-supported health-related activities per year (17% in fitness, 40% in health risk assessment activities). Employees participated more where coworkers endorsed such programs. Minority employees and employees in lower level positions were more Likely to participate in fitness activities when organizations had a more comprehensive program structure, engaged in more marketing strategies, gave time off to employees to participate, or had on-site facilities. Management support for the program was related to participation by employees who were male, white, and had upper level positions. The data supported the proposed model; also confirmed was two predicted relationships between model constructs, which provided a better understanding of differential participation by employee groups.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 223
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Comparison of participation in federal worksite and community health promotion programs
    Crump, CE
    Shegog, R
    Gottlieb, NH
    Grunbaum, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2001, 15 (04) : 232 - 236
  • [2] CHARACTERISTICS OF HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAMS IN FEDERAL WORKSITES - FINDINGS FROM THE FEDERAL-EMPLOYEE WORKSITE PROJECT
    CARTER, WB
    OMENN, GS
    MARTIN, M
    CRUMP, C
    GRUNBAUM, JA
    WILLIAMS, OD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1995, 10 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [3] Employee perceived barriers to participation in worksite health promotion
    Nöhammer E.
    Stummer H.
    Schusterschitz C.
    [J]. Journal of Public Health, 2014, 22 (1) : 23 - 31
  • [4] MAINTAINING EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION IN WORKPLACE HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAMS
    LOVATO, CY
    GREEN, LW
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1990, 17 (01): : 73 - 88
  • [5] Enhancing employee participation in corporate health promotion programs
    Anspaugh, DJ
    Hunter, S
    Savage, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 1996, 20 (03): : 112 - 120
  • [6] Worksite health promotion programs in the US: Factors associated with availability and participation
    Grosch, JW
    Alterman, T
    Petersen, MR
    Murphy, LR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1998, 13 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [7] Building program participation: Strategies for recruitment and retention in worksite health promotion programs
    Serxner, S
    Anderson, DR
    Gold, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2004, 18 (04) : 1 - 6
  • [8] Using theory to understand the multiple determinants of low participation in worksite health promotion programs
    Linnan, LA
    Sorensen, G
    Colditz, G
    Klar, N
    Emmons, KM
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 28 (05) : 591 - 607
  • [9] Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    Lewis, Megan A.
    Linnan, Laura A.
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2009, 24 (02) : 292 - 305
  • [10] Women who work in manufacturing settings: Factors influencing their participation in worksite health promotion programs
    Emmons, KM
    Linnan, L
    Abrams, D
    Lovell, HJ
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 1996, 6 (02) : 74 - 81