Global approximation and optimization using adjoint computational fluid dynamics codes

被引:15
|
作者
Leary, SJ [1 ]
Bhaskar, A [1 ]
Keane, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Engn Sci, Computat Engn & Design Ctr, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.2514/1.9114
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Approximation methods have found increasing use in the optimization of complex engineering systems. The approximation method provides a surrogate model that, once constructed, can be used in lieu of the original expensive model for the purposes of optimization. These approximations may be defined locally, for example, a low-order polynomial response surface approximation that employs trust region methodology during optimization, or globally, by the use of techniques such as kriging. Adjoint methods for computational fluid dynamics have made it possible to obtain sensitivity information on the model's response without recourse to finite differencing. This approach then allows for an efficient local optimization strategy where these sensitivities are utilized in gradient-based optimization. The combined use of an adjoint computational fluid dynamics code with approximation methods (incorporating gradients) for global optimization is shown. Several approximation methods are considered. It is shown that an adjoint-based approximation model can provide increased accuracy over traditional nongradient-based approximations at comparable cost, at least for modest numbers of design variables. As a result, these models are-found to be more reliable for surrogate assisted optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 641
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Batch reactor design optimization using computational fluid dynamics
    Mokhtari, S
    Bailey, J
    11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED THERMAL PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTORS, 2003, : 185 - 185
  • [22] A Heat Conduction and Convection Analytical Benchmark for Adjoint Solution Verification of Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes Used in Reactor Design
    Cacuci, Dan G.
    Fang, Ruixian
    Ilic, Milica
    Badea, Madalina C.
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 182 (04) : 452 - 480
  • [23] Shape optimization with computational fluid dynamics
    El-Sayed, M
    Sun, T
    Berry, J
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2005, 36 (09) : 607 - 613
  • [24] Optimal design of wind farms in complex terrains using computational fluid dynamics and adjoint methods
    Antonini, Enrico G. A.
    Romero, David A.
    Amon, Cristina H.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
  • [25] Optimization of Air Distribution in a Baghouse Filter Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Lima, Wagner Ferreira
    Huebner, Rudolf
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (04) : 4452 - 4456
  • [26] Optimization of a hydrodynamic separator using a multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach
    Schmitt, Vivien
    Dufresne, Matthieu
    Vazquez, Jose
    Fischer, Martin
    Morin, Antoine
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 68 (07) : 1574 - 1581
  • [27] OPTIMIZATION OF BIOREACTOR OPERATING CONDITIONS USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS TECHNIQUES
    Koerich, Daniela M.
    Rosa, Leonardo M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 95 (01): : 199 - 204
  • [28] DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A VLSI HEATSINK USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    HAYWARD, JD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE : NINTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS PACKAGING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1989, : 328 - 341
  • [29] Optimization of a Magnetic Linear Transducer Actuator Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Pitre, John, Jr.
    Kruger, Grant
    Koziol, Leo
    Vollmer, Alan
    Weitzel, William
    Bull, Joseph
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2013, : 2072 - 2075
  • [30] Design Optimization of an Improved Mud Cookstove Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Dhakare, Saurabh
    Wathore, Roshan
    Bherwani, Hemant
    Gupta, Ankit
    Dhoble, Ashwinkumar S.
    Labhasetwar, Nitin
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,