A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy

被引:74
|
作者
Jain, JK
Dutton, C
Harwood, B
Meckstroth, KR
Mishell, DR
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.6.1477
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be an effective single agent for medical abortion. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared a regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone for termination of early pregnancy. METHODS: 250 women with gestations less than or equal to56 days were randomized by a random number table to receive either 200 mg mifepristone orally or placebo followed 48 h later by 800 mug vaginal misoprostol. Administration of misoprostol was repeated every 24 h up to three doses if abortion failed to occur. Abortion success was defined as complete abortion without the use of surgical aspiration. RESULTS: Successful medical abortions occurred in 114 out of 119 subjects (95.7%) after mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol. In all, 110 out of 125 subjects (88.0%) successfully aborted after placebo and vaginal misoprostol. The higher success rate of complete abortion with the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was statistically significant compared with the placebo and misoprostol regimen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol was significantly more effective for termination of pregnancies less than or equal to56 days than misoprostol alone. The 88% efficacy obtained with vaginal misoprostol alone may be clinically acceptable when mifepristone is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1482
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in termination of pregnancy in the second trimester
    Tang, O. S.
    Lau, W. N. T.
    Chan, C. C. W.
    Ho, P. C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 157 - 157
  • [22] Mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion in gestation 63 days or less in Nepalese women: A quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Chawdhary, Rashmi
    Rana, Ashma
    Pradhan, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (01) : 78 - 85
  • [23] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Fogertey, Patricia J.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02): : 247 - 252
  • [24] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Visser, Liesbeth
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 156 - 157
  • [25] Results of a highly significant, prematurely halted Dutch multicenter randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study of pretreatment with mifepristone to misoprostol in early pregnancy failure (triple m)
    Hamel, L.
    Van den Berg, J.
    Coppus, S.
    Snijders, M.
    Vandenbussche, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 136 - 137
  • [26] A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF ORAL MIFEPRISTONE AND VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL IN TERMINATION OF PREGNANCIES UPTO 63 DAYS OF GESTATION
    Singh, Th Digel
    Pinky, S.
    Davison, M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (90): : 15549 - 15551
  • [27] A Prospective Trial Using Mifepristone and Vaginal Misoprostol in Termination of Pregnancies up to 63 Days of Gestation
    Sonal, Kumar
    Meenal, Patvekar
    Hemant, Deshpande
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2013, 63 (06): : 370 - 372
  • [28] Randomized Double-Blinded Comparison of Titrated Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction
    Kennel, Patricia
    Fu, Jessica
    Frisch, Donald
    Hom, Katherine
    Allen, Hilary
    Matsunaga-Kirgan, Marsha
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 158S - 158S
  • [29] Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized prospective placebo-controlled study
    Zahran, Kamal M.
    Shahin, Ahmed Y.
    Abdellah, Mohamad S.
    Elsayh, Khalid I.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (06) : 1054 - 1060
  • [30] Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial
    Hamel, Charlotte
    Coppus, Sjors
    van den Berg, Joyce
    Hink, Esther
    van Seeters, Jacoba
    van Kesteren, Paul
    Merien, Ashley
    Torrenga, Bas
    van de Laar, Rafli
    van Scheltinga, Josien Terwisscha
    Gaugler-Senden, Ingrid
    Graziosi, Peppino
    van Rumste, Minouche
    Nelissen, Ewka
    Vandenbussche, Frank
    Snijders, Marcus
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 32