A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy

被引:74
|
作者
Jain, JK
Dutton, C
Harwood, B
Meckstroth, KR
Mishell, DR
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.6.1477
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be an effective single agent for medical abortion. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared a regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone for termination of early pregnancy. METHODS: 250 women with gestations less than or equal to56 days were randomized by a random number table to receive either 200 mg mifepristone orally or placebo followed 48 h later by 800 mug vaginal misoprostol. Administration of misoprostol was repeated every 24 h up to three doses if abortion failed to occur. Abortion success was defined as complete abortion without the use of surgical aspiration. RESULTS: Successful medical abortions occurred in 114 out of 119 subjects (95.7%) after mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol. In all, 110 out of 125 subjects (88.0%) successfully aborted after placebo and vaginal misoprostol. The higher success rate of complete abortion with the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was statistically significant compared with the placebo and misoprostol regimen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol was significantly more effective for termination of pregnancies less than or equal to56 days than misoprostol alone. The 88% efficacy obtained with vaginal misoprostol alone may be clinically acceptable when mifepristone is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1482
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol with Misoprostol Alone for Treatment of Early Pregnancy Failure: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Sinha P.
    Suneja A.
    Guleria K.
    Aggarwal R.
    Vaid N.B.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (1) : 39 - 44
  • [2] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for management of early pregnancy failures
    Lister, MS
    Shaffer, LET
    Bell, JG
    Lutter, KQ
    Moorma, KH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (04) : 1338 - 1343
  • [3] Intracervical sodium nitroprusside versus vaginal misoprostol in first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomized double-blinded controlled trial
    Chan, CCW
    Tang, OS
    Ng, EHY
    Li, CF
    Ho, PC
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) : 829 - 833
  • [4] MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL VS. MISOPROSTOL ALONE FOR MID-TRIMESTER TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY (14-21 WEEKS LMP): A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLINDED TRIAL
    Raghavan, S.
    Ngoc, N. T.
    Shochet, T.
    Blum, J.
    Nga, N. B.
    Minh, N. T.
    Quy, P., V
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (03) : 303 - 304
  • [5] Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial comparing mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the treatment of early pregnancy loss
    Hamel, Charlotte C.
    Snijders, Marcus P. L. M.
    Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
    Vandenbussche, Frank P. H. A.
    Braat, Didi D. M.
    Adang, Eddy M. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [6] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial)
    Joyce van den Berg
    Charlotte C. Hamel
    Marcus P. Snijders
    Sjors F. Coppus
    Frank P. Vandenbussche
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [7] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial)
    van den Berg, Joyce
    Hamel, Charlotte C.
    Snijders, Marcus P.
    Coppus, Sjors F.
    Vandenbussche, Frank P.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [8] Termination of early pregnancy with a reduced oral dose of mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol
    Anjum, ZK
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 90 (09): : 889 - 891
  • [9] A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, Hilda
    Abraham, Anuja
    Sebastian, Ajit
    Benjamin, Santosh J.
    Jeyaseelan, Visalakshi
    Mathews, Jiji E.
    TROPICAL DOCTOR, 2016, 46 (04) : 198 - 205
  • [10] Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Buccal Misoprostol for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Al, Ragip A.
    Yapca, Omer E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (03): : 593 - 598