Social and Environmental Regulations and Corporate Innovation

被引:4
|
作者
Cao, Zhi [1 ]
Mu, Yinping [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 610056, Peoples R China
关键词
mandatory disclosure; difference-in-differences; CSR performance; institutional investors; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE; IMPACT; OWNERSHIP; EARNINGS; COST;
D O I
10.3390/su142316275
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we investigate the effects of mandatory social and environmental regulations (MSER) on firm innovation. In 2008, the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange in China published regulations that mandate some public firms to disclose their social and environmental governance information in their annual reports. As the MSER apply only to selected firms, this provides an ideal setting for us to observe the effects of MSER on firm innovation. Using a difference-in-differences with propensity-score-matching methodology, we find that the treatment firms experience a significant increase in innovation in terms of the number of total patents and invention patents. More importantly, we further explore three possible mechanisms underlying this association, that is, the corporate social responsibility (CSR)-improving effect, information-disclosing effect, and market-reaction effect, and demonstrate that this positive relationship is mainly driven by the CSR-improving effect and market-reaction effect, manifesting in an improvement in CSR performance and a decline in transient institutional investors for the treatment firms, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantity and quality: The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on corporate green innovation
    Zhang, Hua
    Lai, Jie
    Jie, Shuijing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 354
  • [42] Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Finance and Environmental Performance: Does Green Innovation Matter?
    Dai, Xiaofei
    Siddik, Abu Bakkar
    Tian, Huawei
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [43] Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China?
    Zheng, Mingbo
    Feng, Gen-Fu
    Jiang, Ren-Ai
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (04) : 1670 - 1679
  • [44] Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?
    Li, Dongdong
    Wang, Leonard F. S.
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (05) : 1439 - 1447
  • [45] Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance
    Broadstock, David C.
    Matousek, Roman
    Meyer, Martin
    Tzeremes, Nickolaos G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 119 : 99 - 110
  • [46] COST OF SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS IN CONSTRUCTION
    KOEHN, E
    BENSON, RE
    SHANK, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION-ASCE, 1978, 104 (02): : 117 - 122
  • [47] Corporate Social Responsibility and Technological Innovation
    Jia, Yonghong
    Gao, Xinghua
    Billings, B. Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (01) : 163 - 186
  • [48] Corporate social responsibility driven innovation
    Kim, Yunhee
    Brodhag, Christian
    Mebratu, Desta
    [J]. INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (02) : 175 - 196
  • [49] INNOVATION IN THE CONTEXT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Mazur-Wierzbicka, Ewa
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2018), 2018, : 645 - 655
  • [50] Social dishonesty and corporate green innovation
    Liu, Ting
    Quan, Lei
    Gao, Xing
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 79 : 967 - 985