Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment scale

被引:0
|
作者
Turan, Nuray [1 ]
Ozsaban, Aysel [2 ]
Aydin, Gulsun Ozdemir [3 ]
Turkoglu, Meryem [4 ]
Kaya, Hatice [1 ]
Acaroglu, Rengin [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Dept Fundamentals Nursing, Florence Nightingale Nursing Fac, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Fundamentals Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Hlth Sch, Nursing Dept, Tekirda, Turkey
[4] Univ Hlth Sci, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thorac & Cardiovasc Su, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
nursing assessment; nursing practice; reliability; scale; validity;
D O I
10.1111/ijn.12935
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim This study aimed to translate the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment Scale into Turkish and assess the new version's validity and reliability. Methods This was a methodological study to verify the linguistic equivalence of the scale through the translation/back-translation method. Twelve experts in health assessment confirmed the scale's content validity. Along with the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment Scale, an information form, including socio-demographic features, was distributed to 380 nurses, who consented to participate in the research. Data were collected between July 2017 and April 2018. Internal consistency, factor analysis and test-retest reliability were used to determine consistency over time and intraclass correlations. Results The content validity index of the scale (0.963) was calculated following confirmation of its language equivalence. With the confirmatory factor analysis, it was determined that the fit index values were at an acceptable level and the model was suitable. The factor analysis clustered factors in seven domains. The overall internal consistency coefficient was 0.822. All subscales and the overall scale showed high intraclass correlations. Conclusion The Turkish version of the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable instrument. Summary statement What is already known about this topic? Nursing assessment is a critical step in the nursing process. A holistic and systematic approach is key to improving the quality of nursing care, which may be hindered by barriers to the performance of physical assessment. Several international studies have examined the barriers encountered by nurses; however, there is a lack of both instruments and research on this subject in Turkish literature. What this paper adds? The findings confirmed that the Turkish version of the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable instrument and can be used to determine the barriers to nurses' ability to perform physical assessments. Nurses and clinic managers will be able to use the scale to identify the factors preventing assessment and develop strategies to overcome them. The questionnaire can help eliminate assessment barriers to create an effective and systematic assessment environment. The implications of this paper: Nurses and clinical managers should work together to identify and eliminate assessment barriers. Barriers to nurses' use of physical assessments can be objectively identified through a valid and reliable tool, providing opportunities for the elimination of such barriers and the development of nursing assessment activities.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale
    Onal, Ozgur
    Eroglu, Hande Nur
    Evcil, Fatma Yagmur
    Kisioglu, Ahmet Nesimi
    Uskun, Ersin
    [J]. TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 56 (03): : 230 - 235
  • [42] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the insomnia catastrophizing scale
    Fedai Kabadayi
    Oğuz Mercan
    Sema Yazici-Kabadayi
    Yaser Emir Elhatip
    Baki Büyüksevindik
    [J]. Sleep and Biological Rhythms, 2021, 19 : 459 - 466
  • [43] Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Friendship Activity Scale
    Nalbant, Sibel
    Aktop, Abdurrahman
    Ozer, Dilara
    Hutzler, Yeshayahu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION, 2011, 26 (04) : 523 - 530
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale
    Munis, Ozlem Bizpinar
    Parlak, Mumune Merve
    [J]. BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [45] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Game Addiction Scale
    Akin, Ahmet
    Ozcelik, Basri
    Usta, Fatih
    Akin, Umran
    Secgin, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2015, 4 : 61 - 62
  • [46] A Chinese version of the revised nurses professional values scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Lin, Yu-Hua
    Wang, Liching Sung
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (06) : 492 - 498
  • [47] Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Perception of Health Scale
    Kadioglu, Hasibe
    Yildiz, Ayse
    [J]. TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [48] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the insomnia catastrophizing scale
    Kabadayi, Fedai
    Mercan, Oguz
    Yazici-Kabadayi, Sema
    Elhatip, Yaser Emir
    Buyuksevindik, Baki
    [J]. SLEEP AND BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS, 2021, 19 (04) : 459 - 466
  • [49] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the Individualised Care Scale
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Kaya, Hatice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (1-2) : 136 - 145
  • [50] Reliability and validity study of the Turkish Version of the Psychache Scale
    Demirkol, Mehmet Emin
    Gulec, Huseyin
    Cakmak, Soner
    Namli, Zeynep
    Gulec, Medine
    Guclu, Nazmiye
    Tamam, Lut
    [J]. ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 19 : 14 - 20