Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Lan, Shao-Huan [1 ]
Chao, Chien-Ming [2 ]
Chang, Shen-Peng [3 ]
Lu, Li-Chin [4 ]
Lai, Chih-Cheng [5 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci & Med Technol, Putian, Peoples R China
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Liouying, Taiwan
[3] Yijia Pharm, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Putian Univ, Sch Management, Putian, Peoples R China
[5] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Tainan Branch, Dept Internal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
adverse events; cefoperazone– sulbactam; intra-abdominal infection; microbiologic eradication; GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY; THERAPY; SMART; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; CLINDAMYCIN; GENTAMICIN; GUIDELINES; BACILLI;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2020.468
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam against alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and CKNI databases were searched for relevant articles up to November 25, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical efficacy rate, and the secondary outcomes were microbiologic eradication rate, mortality rate, and adverse event (AE) risk. Results: Twelve studies involving 1,674 patients were included. Overall, the clinical efficacy rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam and comparators was 87.7% and 81.7%, respectively, and cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher clinical efficacy rate than that the comparator (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.00; I-2 = 36%). Additionally, cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a lower clinical failure rate (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I-2 = 0) and a higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.03; I-2 = 0) than the comparators. Cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher microbiologic eradication rate than the comparator (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.72-3.76; I-2 = 0). Finally, there was no significant difference between cefoperazone-sulbactam and the comparators in terms of mortality rate (OR 090; 95% CI 0.38-2.16; I-2 = 0) and AE risk (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.74-1.55; I-2 = 0). Conclusions: The clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam were similar to those of alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Therefore, cefoperazone-sulbactam could be recommended as an effective and safe antibiotic for treating intra-abdominal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 770
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jian
    Pan, Yaping
    Shen, Jilu
    Xu, Yuanhong
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND ANTIMICROBIALS, 2017, 16
  • [22] Intra-abdominal saline irrigation at cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem
    Shukr, Ghadear Hussein
    Chaalan, Tina Taissir
    Nashif, Sereen Khaled
    Eleje, George Uchenna
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (10): : 1588 - 1594
  • [23] Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Reijnders-Boerboom, Gabby T. J. A.
    Albers, Kim I.
    Jacobs, Lotte M. C.
    Helden, Esmee van
    Rosman, Camiel
    Diaz-Cambronero, Oscar
    Mazzinari, Guido
    Scheffer, Gert-Jan
    Keijzer, Christiaan
    Warle, Michiel C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (05) : 1400 - 1411
  • [24] EMPIRIC ANTI-PSEUDOMONAS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY IN COMPLICATED INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Blot, K.
    Vogelaers, D.
    Blot, S.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 : S195 - S195
  • [25] Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Dong, Ruijia
    Li, Zhujun
    Wang, Liquan
    Long, Xiao
    MICROSURGERY, 2021, 41 (08) : 802 - 815
  • [26] Daptomycin efficacy and safety for treatment of Gram positive infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boulekbache, A. B.
    Maldonado, F. M.
    Kavafian, R. K.
    Ferry, T. F.
    Goutelle, S.
    Lega, J. C. L.
    Garreau, R. G.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 36 : 53 - 54
  • [27] CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TREATMENT WITH BISOPROLOL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Cicero, Arrigo
    Tocci, Giuliano
    Kennedy, Cormac
    Grassi, Davide
    Fogacci, Federica
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 : E311 - E312
  • [28] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Appropriate Empiric Anti-Enterococcal Therapy for Intra-Abdominal Infection
    Zhang, Jian
    Yu, Wen-Qiao
    Chen, Wen
    Wei, Tao
    Wang, Chao-Wei
    Zhang, Jing-Ying
    Zhang, Yun
    Liang, Ting-Bo
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2021, 22 (02) : 131 - 143
  • [29] The efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Meng, Rui
    Guan, Xin
    Sun, Lei
    Fei, Zhengyang
    Li, Yuxin
    Luo, Mengjie
    Ma, Aixia
    Li, Hongchao
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [30] The efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of GNB infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
    Chi, Yulong
    Xu, Juan
    Bai, Nan
    Liang, Beibei
    Cai, Yun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2023, 21 (02) : 189 - 201