Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:15
|
作者
Li, Cui-Lan [1 ,2 ]
Song, Li-Ping [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Shi-Yan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Lee Jaden Gil Yu-Kang [3 ]
He, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Xue-Tang [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Yi-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangdong Higher Educ Inst, Key Lab Reprod & Genet, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Inst Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 3, Key Lab Major Obstet Dis Guangdong Prov, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] St Louis Sch, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
self-administration; ultra-early pregnancy; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; MENSTRUAL INDUCTION; EARLY-PREGNANCY; FINAL STAGE; HOME; WOMEN; TERMINATION;
D O I
10.1177/1933719116669055
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for ultra-early medical abortion. A total of 744 women with ultra-early pregnancy (amenorrhea 35 days) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Equal numbers of participants were allocated randomly to the hospital administration and self-administration groups. All participants took 75 mg mifepristone at the initial visit and 400 mu g oral misoprostol 24 hours later in the hospital or by self-administration. The primary end point was complete abortion. Secondary end points were rates of unscheduled reattendance, time required for and cost of hospital observation and follow-up, vaginal bleeding, adverse effects, menstrual disturbance in the posttreatment period, and satisfaction rating. No differences in the rates of complete abortion, unscheduled reattendance, vaginal bleeding, adverse effects, or return of posttreatment menstruation were observed. The time required for (and costs of) hospital observation and follow-up per participant was 557.82 minutes (and US$40.12) in the hospital administration group and 18.46 minutes (and US$1.96) in the self-administration group (both P < .001). Satisfaction rates were similar in both groups, but the rates of very satisfied responses (87.60% vs 25.41%) and follow-up compliance (loss to follow-up, 0.45% vs 7.70%) were higher in the self-administration group (both P < .001). Low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for ultra-early pregnancy termination was as effective and safe as hospital administration, with greater acceptability and lower cost to the women.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 737
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Two Distinct Oral Routes of Misoprostol in Mifepristone Medical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Dzuba, Ilana G.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Crowden, William A.
    Goldberg, Alisa A.
    Gonzales, Juliana
    Howe, Michelle
    Moskowitz, Jeffrey
    Prine, Linda
    Shannon, Caitlin S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06): : 1303 - 1310
  • [12] Early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone followed by buccal misoprostol: a large Australian observational study
    Goldstone, Philip
    Michelson, Jill
    Williamson, Eve
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2012, 197 (05) : 282 - 286
  • [13] Efficacy and acceptability of early mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion in Ukraine: Results of two clinical trials
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Maistruk, Galina
    Shochet, Tara
    Bannikov, Vladimir
    Posohova, Svetlana
    Zhuk, Svetlana
    Lishchuk, Vladimir
    Winikoff, Beverly
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2013, 18 (02): : 112 - 119
  • [14] MEDICAL ABORTION WITH MISOPROSTOL ONLY VS. MIFEPRISTONE PLUS MISOPROSTOL: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Ngoc, N. T.
    Nga, N. T.
    Raghavan, S.
    Winikoff, B.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [15] Simultaneous low-dose mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion: How low can you go?
    Kapp, N
    Borgatta, L
    Ellis, SC
    Vragovic, O
    Stubblefield, P
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 57S - 57S
  • [16] Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting
    Goldstone, Philip
    Walker, Clara
    Hawtin, Katherine
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (03): : 366 - 371
  • [17] Feasibility, efficacy, safety, and acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol for medical abortion in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
    Tran, Nguyen Toan
    Jang, Myong Chon
    Choe, Yong Su
    Ko, Won Su
    Pyo, Hae Suk
    Kim, Ok Suk
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 109 (03) : 209 - 212
  • [18] Effectiveness of early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone and buccal misoprostol in women with no defined intrauterine gestational sac
    Goldstone, Philip
    Michelson, Jill
    Williamson, Eve
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 87 (06) : 855 - 858
  • [19] Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mifepristone in capsule versus tablet form followed by misoprostol for early medical abortion
    Liao, AH
    Han, XJ
    Wu, SY
    Xiao, DZ
    Xiong, CL
    Wu, XR
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 116 (02): : 211 - 216
  • [20] Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol at one day after mifepristone for early medical abortion
    Schaff, EA
    Fielding, SL
    Westhoff, C
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 64 (02) : 81 - 85